Re: Bug with testing framework when not using contrib.auth

On Thu, Nov 4, 2010 at 3:58 AM, Yo-Yo Ma wrote: > Ok, thanks. I'm using CookieStorage for messages, so the issue may not > reside only with legacy storage. Should I create a ticket for this? If you'd be so kind. Yours, Russ Magee %-) -- You received this message

Re: Bug with testing framework when not using contrib.auth

Ok, thanks. I'm using CookieStorage for messages, so the issue may not reside only with legacy storage. Should I create a ticket for this? On Nov 3, 6:11 am, Russell Keith-Magee wrote: > On Wed, Nov 3, 2010 at 1:43 PM, Yo-Yo Ma wrote: > > I've

Re: Bug with testing framework when not using contrib.auth

On Wed, Nov 3, 2010 at 1:43 PM, Yo-Yo Ma wrote: > I've been using CookieStorage (for less DB usage). Us that frowned > upon nowadays, in favor of the DB backend? There is no "db" backend for messages, there is only a "legacy" backend, which, as the name suggests, is for

Re: Bug with testing framework when not using contrib.auth

BTW, my program doesn't have any issues with gangrene. I meant "a slew of 35 errors" in my original post. Sometimes I look back at what I've typed and it amazes me. On Nov 2, 6:26 pm, Russell Keith-Magee wrote: > On Wed, Nov 3, 2010 at 8:18 AM, David P. Novakovic > >

Re: Bug with testing framework when not using contrib.auth

I've been using CookieStorage (for less DB usage). Us that frowned upon nowadays, in favor of the DB backend? On Nov 2, 6:26 pm, Russell Keith-Magee wrote: > On Wed, Nov 3, 2010 at 8:18 AM, David P. Novakovic > > wrote: > > This is certainly an

Re: Bug with testing framework when not using contrib.auth

On Wed, Nov 3, 2010 at 8:18 AM, David P. Novakovic wrote: > This is certainly an artifact of the fact that messages recent started > supporting anonymous messages. Previously it depended on auth. > > I suspect you just need to open a ticket for this. Yes - this is

Re: Bug with testing framework when not using contrib.auth

This is certainly an artifact of the fact that messages recent started supporting anonymous messages. Previously it depended on auth. I suspect you just need to open a ticket for this. On Wed, Nov 3, 2010 at 4:43 AM, Yo-Yo Ma wrote: > I have a large application that

Bug with testing framework when not using contrib.auth

I have a large application that doesn't user contrib.auth, and when I run `manage.py test` I get a slough of 35 errors, all of which are DatabaseError: no such table: auth_user (differing Tracebacks for each). I don't have any actual tests yet, just the SimpleTest that comes free in tests.py.