On 5/15/07, Jeremy Dunck <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Will there be a branch for the SoC work?
If a student wants a branch, I'm sure we'll provide one, but we won't
force it on them; it should be up to each student/mentor pair to
decide how best to manage their project (I'm mentoring one, for
On 5/14/07, Ben Ford <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> How about caching the return of qs.iterator()? Would that work?
> Ben
I'm afraid not; that returns a generator which relies on an active
cursor with the database; the behavior of trying to iterate that at an
arbitrarily later time would depend
On 5/14/07, Gary Wilson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> Jeremy Dunck wrote:
> > Do people think it's worth doing?
>
> Have you seen the (accepted) object-level caching summer of code project?
I hadn't. I think that's lovely functionality and a pretty bad name
for it.My impression from
How about caching the return of qs.iterator()? Would that work?
Ben
On 15/05/07, Jeremy Dunck <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
>
> I'd like to propose an addition to the low-level caching API that
> fills the queryset _result_cache if the value being set (or contained
> in a sequence or dictionary
Jeremy Dunck wrote:
> Do people think it's worth doing?
Have you seen the (accepted) object-level caching summer of code project?
http://code.google.com/soc/django/appinfo.html?csaid=EFBF229544BAC5D0
--~--~-~--~~~---~--~~
You received this message because you
I'd like to propose an addition to the low-level caching API that
fills the queryset _result_cache if the value being set (or contained
in a sequence or dictionary being set) is a queryset.
Consider that before magic-removal, the ORM returned actual lists, so
that something like this was
