My intention is indeed for us to run a new Technical Board election come the
end of 4.2, with much better and more explicit communication about what will be
expected of the new members, and a larger candidate pool to pull from to
hopefully make that work.
I will be posting my actual proposed DE
On Wed, Oct 26, 2022 at 12:02 PM Andrew Godwin wrote:
> At this point, it is my view that it is our job to govern with the people
> we have, and the time and energy they can provide, and that's my intention
> with these suggested changes.
>
If the problem in front of us is that the Technical Boa
I agree the Technical Board has not followed the letter of DEP 10, and I think
the things you have highlighted are all valid failings, but I want to focus on
- what should we do to remedy them?
Given the lack of candidates we already have, if we ditch the current Board and
try to elect a new on
I'm going to avoid trying to get too much into point-by-point
back-and-forth argument here, and try to present the larger picture.
The Technical Board has multiple active responsibilities under DEP 10.
Let's look at some of them:
1. Canvas for feature proposals once per feature release of Django.
I want to offer a perspective from outside the Django community.
> I also saw the relative lack of candidates for Board elections and
essentially thought "better burnt-out me than literally nobody".
I appreciate Andrew's honesty here. I have been a volunteer on our local
mountain rescue team fo
On Tue, Oct 25, 2022, at 12:12 AM, James Bennett wrote:
>
> My first reaction to this is: if having a DEP that says the Technical Board
> is supposed to take the lead in gathering feature proposals didn't get them
> to do it, it doesn't feel like another DEP saying they're responsible for
> t
*Loosening eligibility is fine, though I agree it's going to be very
difficult to write down in an enforceable way -- the DEP 10 language and
process was intended primarily to prevent trolls and other bad-faith actors
from being able to run effectively for the Technical Board, and there's a
balance
Hi James,
On Tuesday, October 25, 2022 at 12:27:03 AM UTC+2 James Bennett wrote:
> On Mon, Oct 24, 2022 at 2:24 PM Andrew Godwin wrote:
>
>> Proposing features - this is already in DEP 10, so I more just want to
>> get that aspect of the Board actually going (and, as a side-effect, have
>> som
On Mon, Oct 24, 2022 at 6:33 PM Andrew Godwin wrote:
> It has not. While I cannot speak for the other members of the Board, I got
> burnt out in 2019, and then the pandemic began, and so it has not really
> been something I've pushed for in the past three years (and I believe I was
> one of the d
> Has that not been occurring? Because if it hasn't, then we have a major
> problem, and I don't see how the current proposal would resolve it.
It has not. While I cannot speak for the other members of the Board, I got
burnt out in 2019, and then the pandemic began, and so it has not really been
On Mon, Oct 24, 2022 at 2:24 PM Andrew Godwin wrote:
> Proposing features - this is already in DEP 10, so I more just want to get
> that aspect of the Board actually going (and, as a side-effect, have
> something to aid fundraising). I am talking with the current Board
> separately on an internal
These are some great points, James - let me try to tackle them roughly in order.
Proposing features - this is already in DEP 10, so I more just want to get that
aspect of the Board actually going (and, as a side-effect, have something to
aid fundraising). I am talking with the current Board sepa
Something I note here is that it's presenting a solution, but not clearly
(at least, from my reading) presenting the problem to be solved.
Is it a lack of people proposing features? If so, I'm not sure this helps
-- it would, to me, suggest that only members of the Technical
Board/Steering Council
Hi everyone,
I want to start a conversation about the Technical Board and its role in
Django, and how I'd like to change it, including its name.
Since its inception, the Technical Board has effectively only functioned as a
backstop vote for large features that require DEPs, of which there have
14 matches
Mail list logo
