I am interested in getting the SlashRoot membership all filed with CLA's.
However, people who work on django at SlashRoot aren't "employees" -
they're members. Can we simply change the language of the CLA or are
the legal wranglings more complex than that?
Might it be simpler for each of us to s
member distinction that you're making
here is significant from the point of view of the CLA. We need a
corporate CLA to cover those jurisdictions where companies implicitly
or contractually own the work of anyone working for them. Whether
those people are called "members" or "em
Or does that not cover the proper basis of members be able to
> > work on django on paid company time?
>
> I'm not sure that the employee/member distinction that you're making
> here is significant from the point of view of the CLA. We need a
> corporate CLA to cover t
gt;> > Might it be simpler for each of us to simply fill out the individual
>> > form? Or does that not cover the proper basis of members be able to
>> > work on django on paid company time?
>>
>> I'm not sure that the employee/member distinction tha
