On Tue, Nov 16, 2010 at 1:47 PM, Simon Litchfield wrote:
> Honza's #5833 is nifty. It's a pity it missed the cut last year for
> 1.1. It's been kicking around for 3 years, and there seems to be
> plenty of similar tickets that it'd address too.
>
> Any chance for 1.3? Is it just the lack of tests/
Honza's #5833 is nifty. It's a pity it missed the cut last year for
1.1. It's been kicking around for 3 years, and there seems to be
plenty of similar tickets that it'd address too.
Any chance for 1.3? Is it just the lack of tests/docs or are there
design concerns?
--
You received this message b
Hi devs,
What do you think, is it a good idea to integrate django-filter by
Alex Gaynor into django admin instead of
[Django] #5833: Custom FilterSpecs which have now 15 people in cc: already?
App is looking nice, and working pretty fine as a foreign library, but
using it from
lterspec
without having to consume the parameters it's using and we could
eliminate the strange forwarding to ?e=1 behavior while still having a
test that the admin doesn't cause on exception on a bad parameter.
Well, I've probably spent more time writing about this small problem
tha
On Feb 10, 5:43 am, Malcolm Tredinnick
wrote:
> Ignoring portions of a URL sounds pretty broken. Our goal isn't to be
> like other frameworks. It's to behave correctly, in accordance with best
> practices for things like URL construction and consumption. I would be a
> little unhappy with 'ignori
On Sun, 2009-02-08 at 10:23 -0800, Ben Gerdemann wrote:
> This seems kind of
> ugly, but I'll bet there are many frameworks out there that simply
> ignore unknown parameters. Thoughts?
Ignoring portions of a URL sounds pretty broken. Our goal isn't to be
like other frameworks. It's to behave cor
On Feb 8, 2:15 pm, Karen Tracey wrote:
> I don't have time to devote to this right now, but I'd suggest taking a look
> at the svn history of the tests that check for the ?e=1 redirect. I have a
> vague recollection that it/they may be there as a result of a problem where
> incorrect lookup par
On Sun, Feb 8, 2009 at 10:28 AM, Ben Gerdemann wrote:
>
> On Feb 7, 12:35 pm, Alex Gaynor wrote:
> > On Sat, Feb 7, 2009 at 8:27 AM, Ben Gerdemann wrote:
> >
> > A couple things, first the patch still has a pair of TODO comments, so
> > either those comments are no longer applicable, or what th
On Feb 7, 12:35 pm, Alex Gaynor wrote:
> On Sat, Feb 7, 2009 at 8:27 AM, Ben Gerdemann wrote:
>
> A couple things, first the patch still has a pair of TODO comments, so
> either those comments are no longer applicable, or what they refer to should
> be fixed. Secondly, it needs docs and tests.
On Sat, Feb 7, 2009 at 8:27 AM, Ben Gerdemann wrote:
>
> Hello,
>
> I'd like to ask what the status of ticked #5833
> http://code.djangoproject.com/ticket/5833
> is. I see that it's listed as a "maybe" feature for 1.1. The patch is
> marked "needs improvement," but it's not clear to me from the b
Hello,
I'd like to ask what the status of ticked #5833
http://code.djangoproject.com/ticket/5833
is. I see that it's listed as a "maybe" feature for 1.1. The patch is
marked "needs improvement," but it's not clear to me from the bug
discussion what improvement is being requested. I (gerdemb) hav
11 matches
Mail list logo
