Thanks Russ, I missed #9475 in my search. I'll have a read through those
tickets...
...and back. I'm leaning towards keeping the API as-is, with
add/create/remove simply unavailable or raising exceptions if the
intermediate model doesn't meet the requirements.
A few reasons:
1. As the discussi
Hi Alex,
Short version - Broadly speaking, this is a feature we've discussed many
times over many years, and we've accepted as a good idea in principle. It's
logged as ticket #9475 [1]. There is some additional discussion on the
original ticket that introduced m2m through models (#6095 [2]).
The
Hi all,
Currently, only M2M fields without custom intermediary models can use the
normal Django M2M form machinery. If you define your own intermediary
models, you need to use inlines instead.
I would like to allow fields with custom through models to use the regular
M2M field/widget automaticall
