On Nov 20, 8:58 am, Malcolm Tredinnick <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
wrote:
> On Thu, 2008-11-20 at 07:20 +0300, Ivan Sagalaev wrote:
> > Malcolm Tredinnick wrote:
> > > Okay. If we go this path, it's something to include in Django, rather
> > > than recommending yet another caching package. We either
Just wanted to say that we ran into this exact issue at work the other day
as well. We had the C and Python versions of memcache running, and it was
hashing things differently (to different servers or something as I
understand it). This caused us a good couple hours of confusion. We
eventually
On Nov 20, 2008, at 05:20, Ivan Sagalaev wrote:
> What concerns me is that this will break the usage of memcached
> without
> Django's cache API. I had the need a couple of times to do plain
> instantiation of memcache.Client and work with it. If it won't see the
> cache the same way as Django
On Thu, 2008-11-20 at 07:20 +0300, Ivan Sagalaev wrote:
> Malcolm Tredinnick wrote:
> > Okay. If we go this path, it's something to include in Django, rather
> > than recommending yet another caching package. We either make it a
> > configuration option to force python-memcache or cmemcache or
Malcolm Tredinnick wrote:
> Okay. If we go this path, it's something to include in Django, rather
> than recommending yet another caching package. We either make it a
> configuration option to force python-memcache or cmemcache or we just
> "Do The Right Thing", with the latter being preferable.
On Nov 20, 2008, at 00:55, Malcolm Tredinnick wrote:
> Okay. If we go this path, it's something to include in Django, rather
> than recommending yet another caching package. We either make it a
> configuration option to force python-memcache or cmemcache or we just
> "Do The Right Thing", with
On Thu, 2008-11-20 at 00:46 +0100, Ludvig Ericson wrote:
> On Nov 20, 2008, at 00:11, Malcolm Tredinnick wrote:
> > That's possible. The hash function in the pure-Python memcached
> > wrapper
> > is replaceable (it's an attribute), so I was looking at replacing it
> > with the version from
On Nov 20, 2008, at 00:11, Malcolm Tredinnick wrote:
> That's possible. The hash function in the pure-Python memcached
> wrapper
> is replaceable (it's an attribute), so I was looking at replacing it
> with the version from cmemcached. Using a third hashing algorithm
> would
> be a bit silly,
On Wed, 2008-11-19 at 03:26 -0800, taleinat wrote:
[...]
> What about having Django's memcached cache backend implement its own
> hashing algorithm? This could be the "standard" one used in
> libmemcache and cmemcache, or perhaps a consistent hashing algorithm
> [1] such as libketama[2].
That's
On Nov 19, 2008, at 12:26, taleinat wrote:
> What about having Django's memcached cache backend implement its own
> hashing algorithm? This could be the "standard" one used in
> libmemcache and cmemcache, or perhaps a consistent hashing algorithm
> [1] such as libketama[2].
As I said in the
On Oct 8, 10:54 am, Malcolm Tredinnick wrote:
> On Wed, 2008-10-08 at 10:37 +0200, Ludvig Ericson wrote:
> > Hello,
> > I had issues with Django opting to use cmemcache and secondarily
> > python-memcached.
>
> > This behavior is extremely dangerous-- lest you be aware, cmemcache
> > and
On Oct 8, 2008, at 10:54, Malcolm Tredinnick wrote:
> Could you create a documentation patch, or at least open a ticket
> about
> this, please, so that somebody else creates a documentation patch?
> This
> is definitely worth recording in the docs. It's ultimately a
> configuration issue
On Wed, 2008-10-08 at 10:37 +0200, Ludvig Ericson wrote:
> Hello,
> I had issues with Django opting to use cmemcache and secondarily
> python-memcached.
>
> This behavior is extremely dangerous-- lest you be aware, cmemcache
> and python-memcached disagree on how to choose memcached in a
Hello,
I had issues with Django opting to use cmemcache and secondarily
python-memcached.
This behavior is extremely dangerous-- lest you be aware, cmemcache
and python-memcached disagree on how to choose memcached in a list.
Now set up four-five machines with slightly varying needs,
14 matches
Mail list logo
