I am also curious about this. With in the next few weeks I have a
project that will need a HTML editor in the admin interface. If this
work will include it I would be happy to wait versus having to branch
off from trunk.
--~--~-~--~~~---~--~~
You received this mes
Am 09.02.2006 um 15:34 schrieb Jacob Kaplan-Moss:
> On Feb 9, 2006, at 2:55 AM, Ian Holsman wrote:
>> a while back Euguene mentioned on djnago-users that 0.92 will have
>> dojo ajax components in the admin interface.
>>
>> is this being developed on a seperate branch?
>> I'd like to talk about the
Thanks Ian. Is there a plan for the development of this sort of widget
as part of dojo in general that you are aware of that could fit into django?
Regards,
David
Ian Holsman wrote:
> http://turboajax.com/turbowidgets/ might be of interestest.
>
> BTW. they are about $200 for commerical use.
>
On 2/17/06, Ian Holsman <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> http://turboajax.com/turbowidgets/ might be of interestest.
>
> BTW. they are about $200 for commerical use.
>
I also found that :
"TurboWidgets are not open-source, but are free for non-commercial use."
--
I like python!
My Blog: http://ww
http://turboajax.com/turbowidgets/ might be of interestest.
BTW. they are about $200 for commerical use.
On 2/17/06, David Pratt <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> Can someone advise whether there is a grid type widget for dojo that
> could work with model data. Many thanks.
>
> David
>
>
>
--
[EM
Can someone advise whether there is a grid type widget for dojo that
could work with model data. Many thanks.
David
--~--~-~--~~~---~--~~
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
"Django developers" group.
To post to this group,
simplejson rocks. no objections here.
>I'm thinking of including simplejson (http://undefined.org/python/
>#simplejson) as Django's standard JSON library (as django.utils.json,
>probably); any objections from anyone?
Nope, I'm _very_ fine with that decision. I used json.py, but only
because at that time simplejson wasn't there. And j
you might want to take a look at adding
http://svn.zilbo.com/svn/django/common/json/DjangoJson.py on top of
it.
so that it can handle model classes and dates.
regards
Ian
On 2/11/06, Jacob Kaplan-Moss <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> On Feb 9, 2006, at 3:03 PM, Ian Holsman wrote:
> > I've been wor
On Feb 9, 2006, at 3:03 PM, Ian Holsman wrote:
> I've been working more on things at the Add/ChangeManipulator level,
> to allow you to bring up a dialog box and post a comment through
> Dojo's post thingy. the only real difference is that instead of a HTML
> template returning, it just returns a
On 2/10/06, Jacob Kaplan-Moss <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> What I was planning for JS validation was an API that's very similar
> to the existing validation API. You'd pass in the name of the field
> to validate and all the data currently in the form and get back a
> list of error messages on th
On Feb 9, 2006, at 2:55 AM, Ian Holsman wrote:
a while back Euguene mentioned on djnago-users that 0.92 will have
dojo ajax components in the admin interface.
is this being developed on a seperate branch?
I'd like to talk about the json layer, and how a common method for
sending errors in valid
hi.
a while back Euguene mentioned on djnago-users that 0.92 will have
dojo ajax components in the admin interface.
is this being developed on a seperate branch?
I'd like to talk about the json layer, and how a common method for
sending errors in validation/processing to the front end could work.
13 matches
Mail list logo
