On Tue, Nov 1, 2022, at 6:54 AM, C. Kirby wrote:
> Having run the elections for the current technical board I agree with
> Andrew's assessment that a more open requirement to run is a good idea. It
> may create a bit more work on candidate verification for the DSF Board and
> Fellows, but anyt
Having run the elections for the current technical board I agree with
Andrew's assessment that a more open requirement to run is a good idea. It
may create a bit more work on candidate verification for the DSF Board and
Fellows, but anything that can work to encourage new blood in the
"Leadersh
On Sun, Oct 30, 2022, at 10:42 PM, James Bennett wrote:
> On Wed, Oct 26, 2022 at 4:34 PM Andrew Godwin wrote:
>> __
>>
>> I have copied in the DSF Members mailing list as it is a governance-related
>> DEP, but if we could keep all discussion on the thread in the Django
>> Developers mailing
On Wed, Oct 26, 2022 at 4:34 PM Andrew Godwin wrote:
> I have copied in the DSF Members mailing list as it is a
> governance-related DEP, but if we could keep all discussion on the thread
> in the Django Developers mailing list, as per DEP 0001, that would be great.
>
My main concern remains the
Hi all,
As a followup to my previous post about potential changes to the Technical
Board - for which I thank you all for the feedback - I have taken the process
to the next step and written a draft DEP:
https://github.com/django/deps/pull/75/files
(If you wish to see the DEP with styling, it c