On Monday, April 8, 2013 3:31:48 AM UTC-6, Aymeric Augustin wrote:
>
> On 8 avr. 2013, at 10:21, VernonCole
> wrote:
>
> > 1) re-implement the argument signature of adodbapi so that it agrees
> with the recommendation for positional and keyword arguments in PEP 249,
>
On 8 avr. 2013, at 10:21, VernonCole wrote:
> 1) re-implement the argument signature of adodbapi so that it agrees with the
> recommendation for positional and keyword arguments in PEP 249, except that
> the first positional argument is called "connection_string" rather
Thanks for the feedback. I have incorporated your suggestions into my
design. There is nobody around here I can use for a design review, so,
begging your forgiveness, I will have to do it here. Here is how I am
setting up the prototype...
1) re-implement the argument signature of adodbapi so
Hi Vernon,
Here's my feedback. (It turns out to be quite similar to Michael's.)
> 1) Assume that a Proxy based connection will be acceptable for inclusion in
> django?
It seems to me that a custom database backend could handle this:
- subclass an existing backend
- override the implementation
On Thu, Apr 4, 2013 at 10:10 AM, VernonCole wrote:
> In order to meet these goals, is it reasonable to do this?: Are there
> better alternatives?
>
> 1) Assume that a Proxy based connection will be acceptable for inclusion
> in django?
>
Best way to mentally think of this
Dear Gurus:
At the bottom of this text there will be a question. In order for you to
provide a quality answer to the question, you need more information.
Perhaps a lot more information. The next few paragraphs will attempt to
provide that. They will also be an introduction to a couple of