On Fri, Jul 30, 2010 at 1:54 AM, shacker wrote:
> ... except that it's not working just fine (because of this dependency
> on Grappelli).
That sounds like a problem with the 3rd party app, not something that would
be resolved by incorporating it in Django proper. That said, as Russell
suggests,
On Jul 29, 8:09 pm, Tobias McNulty wrote:
>
> For whatever it's worth, my sense is that there are a number of these types
> of third party apps out there, and no single one is a clear winner.
I would have to respectfully disagree - FileBrowser is far and away
the clear winner. There are no viable
On Fri, Jul 30, 2010 at 11:09 AM, Tobias McNulty wrote:
> On Thu, Jul 29, 2010 at 3:32 PM, shacker wrote:
>>
>> I've been thinking that it seems like solid file management would be a
>> good candidate for inclusion in contrib, but wanted to put feeler out
>> on this list to see whether others mig
On Thu, Jul 29, 2010 at 3:32 PM, shacker wrote:
>
> I've been thinking that it seems like solid file management would be a
> good candidate for inclusion in contrib, but wanted to put feeler out
> on this list to see whether others might agree. Would this make a good
> 1.3 feature?
-1
For whate
I use django-filebrowser in a number of projects and find it
invaluable. As of a while ago, Filebrowser became dependent on django-
grappelli, which massively changes the default Django admin.
Meanwhile, Grappelli has morphed and (I feel) become a pain in the
neck to work with (buggy and difficult
