This topic came up in discussion today and Peter pointed us here.
Kudos to Andrew for showing initiative.
Short of new tutorials, I think the best service we could do for the
(beginner) community is to at least call out a sidebar that provides
some brief context around whether or not to namespace
On 12/06/2010 01:03, Russell Keith-Magee wrote:
What - very very quickly? I don't see the problem :-)
Well, that wasn't quite the quality I was going for, but you never know.
Problem is there's several things that could go in a part 5 (in addition to all
of those there currently),
On Saturday, June 12, 2010, Andrew Godwin wrote:
>
>
> On 11/06/2010 17:38, Russell Keith-Magee wrote:
>
> You're not missing anything specific -- it's really just a matter of
> time. Good documentation take time to write; doubly so for good
> tutorials.
>
> The issue you
On 11/06/2010 17:38, Russell Keith-Magee wrote:
You're not missing anything specific -- it's really just a matter of
time. Good documentation take time to write; doubly so for good
tutorials.
The issue you raise - that the current tutorial is exclusively "app
inside project" has been raised
On Fri, Jun 11, 2010 at 1:21 AM, Andrew Godwin <and...@aeracode.org> wrote:
> Hi all,
>
> I noticed today that the tutorial still does imports like "from
> mysite.polls.models import Poll", and URLs like "(r'^polls/$',
> 'mysite.polls.views.index')"
Of Andrew Godwin
Sent: Friday, June 11, 2010 9:11 AM
To: django-developers@googlegroups.com
Subject: Re: Imports in the tutorial
Compared to the alternative, and the unlikeliness of this scenario, I
really feel it's the best move, unless we try to teach new users about
virtualenv, pip, dependency
On 11/06/10 17:00, Peter Baumgartner wrote:
> Why do your two sites need to share the same python path? Virtualenv
> solves this problem quite gracefully.
>
They don't have to, but bear in mind that:
a) The tutorial is aimed at people new to Django, and often new to
Python. Virtualenv isn't
On Fri, Jun 11, 2010 at 9:16 AM, Andrew Godwin wrote:
>
>
> On 11/06/2010 03:28, Peter Baumgartner wrote:
>>
>> In my experience, almost every project has domain-specific
>> applications that don't get reused. If you have a reusable app, you
>> bundle it separately (like
On Fri, Jun 11, 2010 at 10:16 AM, Andrew Godwin wrote:
>> I agree that it is confusing that it will work either way, but I'd
>> argue in favor of using the project name everywhere. It is explicit
>> instead of mucking around with the Python path behind the scenes.
>>
>
>
On 11/06/2010 03:28, Peter Baumgartner wrote:
In my experience, almost every project has domain-specific
applications that don't get reused. If you have a reusable app, you
bundle it separately (like South).
I entirely agree, but there's also a lot of domain-specific apps people
make
On Thu, Jun 10, 2010 at 11:21 AM, Andrew Godwin <and...@aeracode.org> wrote:
> Hi all,
>
> I noticed today that the tutorial still does imports like "from
> mysite.polls.models import Poll", and URLs like "(r'^polls/$',
> 'mysite.polls.views.index')".
>
"I agree, and while we're at it also change the settings.py template to
just point to urls instead of project_name.urls"
Indeed, always the first thing I change when I start a project...
Having the project_name there means you are including the directory
above your project in the python path in
I agree, and while we're at it also change the settings.py template to
just point to urls instead of project_name.urls
On Jun 10, 7:21 pm, Andrew Godwin <and...@aeracode.org> wrote:
> Hi all,
>
> I noticed today that the tutorial still does imports like "from
> mysite.p
Hi all,
I noticed today that the tutorial still does imports like "from
mysite.polls.models import Poll", and URLs like "(r'^polls/$',
'mysite.polls.views.index')".
At least in the places and projects I've worked with, the standard has
been not to use the project name a
14 matches
Mail list logo