On 3/21/06, Christopher Lenz <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Has something like the following syntax been discussed here before?
>
>Article.objects.filter(Article.author.name == 'fred')
>Article.objects.filter(Article.author.name.contains('fred'))
>etc
Yeah, that's been discussed and sho
Am 19.03.2006 um 08:12 schrieb Max Battcher:
> Russell Keith-Magee wrote:
>> You still need to parse kwargs to handle queries across joins (e.g.,
>> Article.objects.filter(author__name__exact='fred'))
>
> Just playing around with ideas, but what if you could do something
> like:
>
> Article.obje
Russell Keith-Magee wrote:
> You still need to parse kwargs to handle queries across joins (e.g.,
> Article.objects.filter(author__name__exact='fred'))
Just playing around with ideas, but what if you could do something like:
Article.objects.filter(author=Author.objects.filter(name='fred'))
It's
Eugene Lazutkin wrote:
> What was the motivation behind using complex kwargs like (taken from
> http://code.djangoproject.com/wiki/RemovingTheMagic):
The complex kwargs predate magic-removal. Most of the magic kwargs are
slowly disappearing, too, like the sudden recent introduction of
.exclud
Russell Keith-Magee wrote:
>
> Interesting, but I'm not sure I see the advantage. I don't think this
> notation is inherently more obvious, and I don't see any use cases
> that the existing notation does not service, but this notation would
> be able to service.
I don't see either. It is a pure
On 3/18/06, Eugene Lazutkin <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> Why don't we use something simple, like tuples:
>
> pubdate=('year', 2005)
> name='John' (it is possible now)
> fname=('contains','n')
Interesting, but I'm not sure I see the advantage. I don't think this
notation is inherently more obvio
On Fri, 2006-03-17 at 19:30 -0600, Eugene Lazutkin wrote:
> What was the motivation behind using complex kwargs like (taken from
> http://code.djangoproject.com/wiki/RemovingTheMagic):
>
> pubdate__year=2005
>
> fname__contains='n'
> name__exact='John' (can be abbreviated to name='John')
> and
Eugene Lazutkin wrote:
> What was the motivation behind using complex kwargs like (taken from
> http://code.djangoproject.com/wiki/RemovingTheMagic):
>
> pubdate__year=2005
>
> fname__contains='n'
> name__exact='John' (can be abbreviated to name='John')
> and so an?
>
> Why don't we use someth
What was the motivation behind using complex kwargs like (taken from
http://code.djangoproject.com/wiki/RemovingTheMagic):
pubdate__year=2005
fname__contains='n'
name__exact='John' (can be abbreviated to name='John')
and so an?
Why don't we use something simple, like tuples:
pubdate=('year',
