Robert Wittams wrote:
> I noticed louie requires python 2.4. Django is currently supporting 2.3
> upwards. How hard would it be to support 2.3?
Louie 1.0 is now out, and supports both Python 2.3 and Python 2.4:
http://cheeseshop.python.org/pypi/Louie
Robert Wittams пишет:
> The way that it works now, everything is standard python resolution,
> object creation, with the single addition that attributes get to poke at
> the class if they want to.
>
> Anyway, the following look perfectly reasonable and clear to me:
>
> class Something(Model):
>
Patrick K. O'Brien wrote:
>
> Robert Wittams wrote:
>
>>>http://louie.berlios.de/
>>
>>Argh, this is getting ridiculous.
>
>
> Oh? Sorry, didn't mean to make things difficult for you...
I meant me replying three times to the same message ;-)
>>I noticed louie requires python 2.4. Django is
Robert Wittams wrote:
> > http://louie.berlios.de/
>
> Argh, this is getting ridiculous.
Oh? Sorry, didn't mean to make things difficult for you...
> I noticed louie requires python 2.4. Django is currently supporting 2.3
> upwards. How hard would it be to support 2.3?
That shouldn't be too
Robert Wittams wrote:
>
> The other cool thing is, we can pretend its about Louie Armstrong to fit
> in with Django and Ellington ;-)
Can anyone guess the *real* inspiration for the name?
> Also, an issue I had using pydispatcher was that robustapply.function
> does not work with classmethods,
I think using the egg mechanism is going to be much better than
including Louie in your SVN repository, even using svn:external. We
used to do that with Schevo but now rely exclusively on eggs and the
result is much better, imo.
--
Patrick K. O'Brien
Orbtech http://www.orbtech.com
Schevo
>
> No, the whole point is to write a system for adding extensions to
> META. The problem currently is that a model's options aren't
> extensible; my idea keeps metadata with metadata.
Do you really think that the fields themselves *aren't* metadata?
> That's a very good point.
>
>
>One advantage we've had so far is that django has no dependencies, so
>its easy to get up and running. Is there a sane way that we could
>include louie with django (a snapshot in the svn?), but not in eggs, so
>that the egg version will do the setuptools-ly correct thing and
>download/require
> http://louie.berlios.de/
Argh, this is getting ridiculous.
I noticed louie requires python 2.4. Django is currently supporting 2.3
upwards. How hard would it be to support 2.3?
Robert
Patrick K. O'Brien wrote:
> Robert Wittams wrote:
>
>>=== Events ===
>>
>>I discussed this with Adrian on IRC a few times, and we agreed that
>>events would be a good way to handle quite a number of the issues we
>>face - particularly loose coupling.
>>
>>I've looked around, and it seems like
>The really funny thing about this: All of the examples I gave are at
>least as field-like as the existing ManyToMany field.
Yep, that's why I started out with the BEHAVIOUR idea in my comment on
this and dropped it - in the end, most stuff you will do to a model
class will either be some kind
Jacob Kaplan-Moss wrote:
> This rubs me the wrong way a bit. I talked to Adrian about this this
> afternoon in reference to how Managers are created -- another awesome
> improvement, BTW -- and I think my basic problem is the (potential)
> confusion between fields and "behavior" elements.
Hi,
>1. The class is created.
>2. Any class META stuff is taken care of. This may be merged into the
>next step.
>3. Any remaining attributes of the class are added to the class under
>their own control. If they have a method of the signature:
>
>contribute_to_class(self, cls, name)
Hmm. I like
"Robert Wittams" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote in
message news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
>
> === Events ===
>
> I discussed this with Adrian on IRC a few times, and we agreed that
> events would be a good way to handle quite a number of the issues we
> face - particularly loose coupling.
>
> I've looked
On 12/16/05, Robert Wittams <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> There are quite a number of other areas this can be applied to as well.
>
Middleware?
15 matches
Mail list logo
