On Sunday, August 11, 2013 12:26:10 AM UTC+2, Andrew Godwin wrote:
>
> I'll take a look at those over the next few days, Florian, it's the most
> serious bug I've seen for a while!
>
No worries, I was mostly kidding; I want to get this in ASAP too, even with
bugs; we'll have quite some time to fi
I'll take a look at those over the next few days, Florian, it's the most
serious bug I've seen for a while!
Big issues like that aside, this is never going to be bug-free at merge - I
want to bring the merge forward a bit to avoid even more bugs being
introduced by master and this branch deviating
On Saturday, August 10, 2013 4:41:28 AM UTC+2, Russell Keith-Magee wrote:
>
> Say… Andrew… there's this guy on a black horse at my front door… says his
> name is "Famine"… he wants to talk about the coming apocalypse… :-)
>
Indeed, I already got migrations which magically unapply themself everyt
On Fri, Aug 9, 2013 at 9:36 PM, Andrew Godwin wrote:
> Hi everyone,
>
> I think it's finally time to look at merging the schema-alteration branch,
> which has gone slightly beyond its name and encompasses the schema
> alteration backends and the migration code as well.
>
> The branch is working,
Hi everyone,
I think it's finally time to look at merging the schema-alteration branch,
which has gone slightly beyond its name and encompasses the schema
alteration backends and the migration code as well.
The branch is working, well tested, moderately documented and has all of
the big changes t
