On Sep 18, 7:07 am, Malcolm Tredinnick <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
wrote:
> On Wed, 2008-09-17 at 22:19 -0700, mrts wrote:
>
> Keep a handle on the scope. I was going to stay out of this thread until
> some actual code appeared (and I still have a note to re-review Vinay
> Sajip's stuff to remind
On Wed, 2008-09-17 at 22:19 -0700, mrts wrote:
>
>
> On Sep 18, 2:56 am, zvoase <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > I think the app object thing is a really good idea, but I have to say
> > one thing; why not see if some middle ground can be met between the
> > Django cheeseshop idea (going on in
On Sep 18, 2:56 am, zvoase <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> I think the app object thing is a really good idea, but I have to say
> one thing; why not see if some middle ground can be met between the
> Django cheeseshop idea (going on in another thread in this group) and
> this.
That's the point.
I think the app object thing is a really good idea, but I have to say
one thing; why not see if some middle ground can be met between the
Django cheeseshop idea (going on in another thread in this group) and
this.
Maybe an app_info.py file in a Django app directory could give some
info on that
Thats a good list of benefits. The only possible pitfall I see is
making things more complicated rather than simpler.
I'm not sure that versioning would be a good idea within a Django
project. While version and dependency tracking is a good thing, once
you do it to very fine grained level it
On Sep 17, 1:03 am, "John D'Agostino" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
wrote:
> I started working on a patch 6 months ago to implement App objects,
> but unfortunately never got to finish it because at the time I was
> swamped at work.
> Because of the all the work which has happened on trunk the code is
>
On Sep 17, 11:13 am, mrts <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> I just copy-pasted the app objects requirement as listed and discussed
> inhttp://code.djangoproject.com/wiki/InstalledAppsRevision. I
> personally have no use case for it.
Doh, that should have been *multiple* app objects above.
I just copy-pasted the app objects requirement as listed and discussed
in http://code.djangoproject.com/wiki/InstalledAppsRevision . I
personally have no use case for it.
--~--~-~--~~~---~--~~
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google
I started working on a patch 6 months ago to implement App objects,
but unfortunately never got to finish it because at the time I was
swamped at work.
Because of the all the work which has happened on trunk the code is
pretty much useless.
> The following can be addressed with app objects.
>
>
