On 8/11/06, Tom Tobin <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On 8/9/06, Tom Tobin <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > I'd like to restore this ability to Django trunk; there are a couple
> > of ways I could go about this, and I'd like input as to which would be
> > cleaner:
>
> I came up with a third possible wa
On 8/9/06, Tom Tobin <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> I'd like to restore this ability to Django trunk; there are a couple
> of ways I could go about this, and I'd like input as to which would be
> cleaner:
I came up with a third possible way of handling this (which is nearly
identical to the second)
On 8/9/06, Tom Tobin <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> I've already gotten the first case working, and I'll tackle the second
> after work tomorrow; I'll report back with my thoughts after comparing
> the two.
I actually implemented the second case (a ``takes_manipulator``
decoration) last night as
After two far too-long days at work, far too much head-to-desk banging
at home, and a rather stupid aha-I've-got-it, oh-wait-I-don't,
I-need-sleep on Django-users, I've come to the conclusion that post-MR
Django doesn't support manipulator-aware validators. This was
possible in pre-MR-removal ver
