If that's the way you all feel - I'll never speak of it again ;)
--
Petar Marić
*e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
*mobile: +381 (64) 6122467
*icq: 224720322
*skype: petar_maric
*web: http://www.petarmaric.com/
--~--~-~--~~~---~--~~
You received this message because you a
On 4/27/06, Adrian Holovaty <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> A definite -1 on this from me, because it's out of Django's scope.
Agreed.
Also, for the as-yet-undetermined future when we have Dojo integration
merged, people who want WYSIWYG will be able to hang the Dojo
rich-text widget on any text fi
On 4/25/06, Petar Mariæ <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> So, a free global licence for a buffed-up version to one of best
> WYSIWYG XHTML editors today in exchange for a link to xhtml.com? I'm
> so +1 on this :D
A definite -1 on this from me, because it's out of Django's scope.
Besides, requiring a l
On Tue, 2006-04-25 at 22:16 +0200, Petar Marić wrote:
> Greetings Djangonauts,
>
> I'm a pretty happy user of XStandard ( http://www.xstandard.com ), and
> I've already integrated support for XStandard Lite onto my
> django-powered blog (altough the project is on hold at the moment) via
> few sim
On 4/25/06, Petar Mariæ <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> So, a free global licence for a buffed-up version to one of best
> WYSIWYG XHTML editors today in exchange for a link to xhtml.com? I'm
> so +1 on this :D
I'm so -1 on this that words fail me. WYSIWYG HTML editors should be
the concern of specif
On 4/25/06, Petar Marić <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> So, a free global licence for a buffed-up version to one of best
> WYSIWYG XHTML editors today in exchange for a link to xhtml.com? I'm
> so +1 on this :D
I guess I am not sharing your enthusiasm here.
It seems that the purpose of that tool is
