Re: mod_python support

2013-11-25 Thread Russell Keith-Magee
On Tue, Nov 26, 2013 at 12:36 AM, Kamil Gałuszka wrote: > Hi ! > > I wanted to post this in old topic from 2010 but Google always gives me an > error on posting so I can't do that there. (soory for that!) > > I know that mod_python support was dropped long time ago but I think this > information s

Re: mod_python support

2013-11-25 Thread Tom Evans
On Mon, Nov 25, 2013 at 5:09 PM, Ramiro Morales wrote: > Now that specs like WSGI exist there is no point in going back one decade > implementing interfaces to cater for one particular web server integration > implementation. Is that any worse than where we are now, using an interface that only a

Re: mod_python support

2013-11-25 Thread Ramiro Morales
If it implements WSGI then there is no need to add or modify anything from the Django side. Both should be able to talk to each other using that protocol. Now that specs like WSGI exist there is no point in going back one decade implementing interfaces to cater for one particular web server integr

Re: mod_python support

2013-11-25 Thread Kamil Gałuszka
I understand that and I agree that it maybe doesn't have any uptake. But, my reason for sending that information was question from today on django-users about mod_python support on Django. https://groups.google.com/forum/#!topic/django-users/449r3gUsN54 Cheers, Kamil Gałuszka 2013/11/25 Alex Gay

Re: mod_python support

2013-11-25 Thread Alex Gaynor
I'm -1 on this. If it's, in fact, just a normal WSGI container, we should add docs for it if it has any uptake, as we would for any other WSGI container, and I don't believe it has any uptake. Alex On Mon, Nov 25, 2013 at 10:36 AM, Kamil Gałuszka wrote: > Hi ! > > I wanted to post this in old t