Re: Read only Test Was: Speeding up tests

2012-01-27 Thread Thomas Rega
Hi, I am interested in it - could you be so nice and make this available anywhere? Thanks a lot in advance. TR Am 17.01.2012 um 12:04 schrieb Thomas Guettler: > Hi, > > same subject, but different content: > > we have a lot of tests which are read only. They don't modify the database or > o

Re: Read only Test Was: Speeding up tests

2012-01-17 Thread Anssi Kääriäinen
On 01/17/2012 01:04 PM, Thomas Guettler wrote: Hi, same subject, but different content: we have a lot of tests which are read only. They don't modify the database or other files. You don't need to flush the database for every test of read only test cases. These tests can be run on production

Re: Read only Test Was: Speeding up tests

2012-01-17 Thread Łukasz Rekucki
On 17 January 2012 12:04, Thomas Guettler wrote: > Hi, > > same subject, but different content: > > we have a lot of tests which are read only. They don't modify the database > or > other files. I assume your code has a way of checking that the tests are really read only ? If yes, I would be inte

Read only Test Was: Speeding up tests

2012-01-17 Thread Thomas Guettler
Hi, same subject, but different content: we have a lot of tests which are read only. They don't modify the database or other files. You don't need to flush the database for every test of read only test cases. These tests can be run on production servers, too. At the moment, this unittest cod