I went to triage a few tickets tonight, and noticed that #8960,
#10235, #10608 and #13814 have all arrived at essentially the same
conclusion: there needs to be a single idiomatic way to get either the
current Site object if contrib.sites is installed, or a RequestSite
object if not. All four ticke
I should add that #10909 is another ticket that ultimately revolves
around getting a Site/RequestSite object to have access to the current
domain. Easily fixed once this function/method exists.
While I'm at it, #10944 would be moved one step closer by having a
consistent way to get the current Sit
Hi Gabriel, everyone,
I'd also like if such function can support option "developer provides
function that knows the current site based on the request".
That means, "get my site" function ultimately needs a backend connector!
I think this might be fixed in the way we did with urlconf:
http://docs.
On Thu, 2010-09-30 at 23:48 -0700, Gabriel Hurley wrote:
> I went to triage a few tickets tonight, and noticed that #8960,
> #10235, #10608 and #13814 have all arrived at essentially the same
> conclusion: there needs to be a single idiomatic way to get either the
> current Site object if contrib.s
I can see why you might want control at the middleware level, but I'm
not sure that's the only/best way to accomplish that goal, and it
seems like the subject of a totally separate ticket to me. I'd rather
see this set of redundant problems solved in a simple fashion rather
than get into a debate o
On Fri, 2010-10-01 at 12:08 -0700, Gabriel Hurley wrote:
> I can see why you might want control at the middleware level, but I'm
> not sure that's the only/best way to accomplish that goal, and it
> seems like the subject of a totally separate ticket to me. I'd rather
> see this set of redundant pr
There is now a ticket and a patch for this, which includes the utility
method and a rollup of fixes for the aforementioned tickets as
appropriate. Tests and docs included. Details are in the ticket
description:
http://code.djangoproject.com/ticket/14386
I'd love to get some feedback on it when po
Hi Gabriel,
looking good!
On Mon, Oct 4, 2010 at 2:59 PM, Gabriel Hurley wrote:
> There is now a ticket and a patch for this, which includes the utility
> method and a rollup of fixes for the aforementioned tickets as
> appropriate. Tests and docs included. Details are in the ticket
> descriptio
