> Shouldn't this be marked as somewhat blocking for 1.0-alpha?
Personally I would remove XmlField from the standard-models and create
something like django.contrib.xml, which includes some common code for
xml-handling (forms, models, dom/etree/..., xslt with callbacks, etc).
But thats nothing
Shouldn't this be marked as somewhat blocking for 1.0-alpha? Is there any
good reason why the code you wrote has not been accepted?
On Tue, Jul 1, 2008 at 6:46 PM, David Danier <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
wrote:
>
> > I'm trying to understand what's wrong with the XMLField
> I'm trying to understand what's wrong with the XMLField in nfa.
> The validation in validators.py/RelaxNGCompact is never called, It looks
> like unused dead code. This means the validation on XMLFields is
> currently not working at all.
> Is there anyone with a be
Hi,
I'm trying to understand what's wrong with the XMLField in nfa.
The validation in validators.py/RelaxNGCompact is never called, It looks
like unused dead code. This means the validation on XMLFields is currently
not working at all.
Is there anyone with a better understanding of the
