In Django1.5
{% url app_views.client %}
will change to
> {% "url app_views.client" %}
I think it is a stupid idea
Why so many people use django? becouse of 'DRY', but now django become more
and more 'dirty'
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
"Dja
from where U have that info?
and btw. is there repo for developing 1.5 with python3 support?
W dniu wtorek, 27 marca 2012, 10:22:18 UTC+2 użytkownik gs412 napisał:
>
> In Django1.5
>
> {% url app_views.client %}
>
> will change to
>
>> {% "url app_views.client" %}
>
>
> I think it is a stupid
On 27 March 2012 10:22, gs412 wrote:
> In Django1.5
>
>> {% url app_views.client %}
>
> will change to
>>
>> {% "url app_views.client" %}
>
>
> I think it is a stupid idea
Did you read the rationale for this change? How do you want to enable
passing context variables as view names? Did you notice
That example is incorrect.
{% url app_views.client %}
will not change to
{% "url app_views.client" %}
it will change to
{% url "app_views.client" %}
which, as you can see, enables passing the view from something other than a
literal string.
On 27 March 2012 09:22, gs412 wrote:
> In Django1
On Tue, Mar 27, 2012 at 5:22 AM, gs412 wrote:
> In Django1.5
>
>> {% url app_views.client %}
>
> will change to
>>
>> {% "url app_views.client" %}
>
>
> I think it is a stupid idea
> Why so many people use django? becouse of 'DRY', but now django become more
> and more 'dirty'
Please post referen
On Mar 27, 2012 8:45 AM, "Ramiro Morales" wrote:
>
> On Tue, Mar 27, 2012 at 5:22 AM, gs412 wrote:
> > In Django1.5
> >
> >> {% url app_views.client %}
> >
> > will change to
> >>
> >> {% "url app_views.client" %}
> >
>
> Please post references from where did you get this nonsense. It is
> comple
On 27 March 2012 14:22, Shaggy wrote:
> from where U have that info?
Docs and Django 1.3 release notes:
https://docs.djangoproject.com/en/dev/releases/1.3/#changes-to-url-and-ssi
>
> and btw. is there repo for developing 1.5 with python3 support?
>
AFAIK, not yet. There's a features/py3k branch
On 27 mars 2012, at 10:22, gs412 wrote:
> In Django1.5
>
> {% url app_views.client %}
> will change to
> {% "url app_views.client" %}
>
> I think it is a stupid idea
> Why so many people use django? becouse of 'DRY', but now django become more
> and more 'dirty'
Hello,
django-developers isn
On 27 March 2012 14:44, Łukasz Rekucki wrote:
> On 27 March 2012 14:22, Shaggy wrote:
>>
>> and btw. is there repo for developing 1.5 with python3 support?
>>
>
> AFAIK, not yet. There's a features/py3k branch, but I'm not sure if
> it's up to date with Tarek's bitbucket repo. My bet is that py3k
Less symbol is the tide, the future. for example:
coffeescript、sass、haml、slim and python, there are all less symbol, this
feature make developer fell well
passing context variables for tag "url" is not a good idea, it make the
work from easy to hard
> {% with url_name="client-detail-view" %}
>
On Mar 27, 2012 3:26 PM, "gs412" wrote:
>
> Less symbol is the tide, the future. for example:
coffeescript、sass、haml、slim and python, there are all less symbol, this
feature make developer fell well
>
> passing context variables for tag "url" is not a good idea, it make the
work from easy to hard
On Tue, Mar 27, 2012 at 4:26 PM, gs412 wrote:
> Less symbol is the tide, the future. for example:
> coffeescript、sass、haml、slim and python, there are all less symbol, this
> feature make developer fell well
>
> passing context variables for tag "url" is not a good idea, it make the
> work from ea
On Tue, Mar 27, 2012 at 1:26 PM, gs412 wrote:
> Less symbol is the tide, the future. for example:
> coffeescript、sass、haml、slim and python, there are all less symbol, this
> feature make developer fell well
This is incorrect. If Python were all about "fewer symbols", then we
would favor tabs ove
On 28/03/2012, at 3:51 AM, Ian Kelly wrote:
> On Tue, Mar 27, 2012 at 1:26 PM, gs412 wrote:
>> Less symbol is the tide, the future. for example:
>> coffeescript、sass、haml、slim and python, there are all less symbol, this
>> feature make developer fell well
>
> This is incorrect. If Python were
14 matches
Mail list logo
