Re: [Django] #18641: Offline documentation states 1.5 when its for 1.4

#18641: Offline documentation states 1.5 when its for 1.4 -+- Reporter: burhan.khalid@… |Owner: nobody Type: | Status: closed Cleanup/optimizat

[Django] #18641: Offline documentation states 1.5 when its for 1.4

#18641: Offline documentation states 1.5 when its for 1.4 --+ Reporter: burhan.khalid@… | Owner: nobody Type: Cleanup/optimization | Status: new Component: Documentation |Version: 1.4 Se

Re: [Django] #18639: manage.py shell should have a flag to explicitly request iPython or bpython

#18639: manage.py shell should have a flag to explicitly request iPython or bpython -+- Reporter: Alex |Owner: nobody Type: New feature | Status:

[Django] #18640: django.contrib.gis.gdal.DataSource fields give gibberish or segfault when accessed directly

#18640: django.contrib.gis.gdal.DataSource fields give gibberish or segfault when accessed directly ---+ Reporter: YenTheFirst| Owner: nobody Type: Uncategorized | Status: new Component: Uncategorized |Versio

Re: [Django] #18153: Erorneous OneToOneField for instances that have pk unset

#18153: Erorneous OneToOneField for instances that have pk unset -+- Reporter: jbzdak@… |Owner: dhatch Type: Bug | Status: assigned Compon

[Django] #18639: manage.py shell should have a flag to explicitly request iPython or bpython

#18639: manage.py shell should have a flag to explicitly request iPython or bpython -+- Reporter: Alex | Owner: nobody Type: New| Status: new feature

Re: [Django] #18153: Erorneous OneToOneField for instances that have pk unset

#18153: Erorneous OneToOneField for instances that have pk unset -+- Reporter: jbzdak@… |Owner: dhatch Type: Bug | Status: assigned Compon

Re: [Django] #18153: Erorneous OneToOneField for instances that have pk unset

#18153: Erorneous OneToOneField for instances that have pk unset -+- Reporter: jbzdak@… |Owner: dhatch Type: Bug | Status: assigned Compon

Re: [Django] #18153: Erorneous OneToOneField for instances that have pk unset

#18153: Erorneous OneToOneField for instances that have pk unset -+- Reporter: jbzdak@… |Owner: dhatch Type: Bug | Status: assigned Compon

Re: [Django] #18153: Erorneous OneToOneField for instances that have pk unset

#18153: Erorneous OneToOneField for instances that have pk unset -+- Reporter: jbzdak@… |Owner: dhatch Type: Bug | Status: assigned Compon

Re: [Django] #18153: Erorneous OneToOneField for instances that have pk unset

#18153: Erorneous OneToOneField for instances that have pk unset -+- Reporter: jbzdak@… |Owner: dhatch Type: Bug | Status: assigned Compon

Re: [Django] #18153: Erorneous OneToOneField for instances that have pk unset

#18153: Erorneous OneToOneField for instances that have pk unset -+- Reporter: jbzdak@… |Owner: nobody Type: Bug | Status: new Component:

Re: [Django] #18153: Erorneous OneToOneField for instances that have pk unset

#18153: Erorneous OneToOneField for instances that have pk unset -+- Reporter: jbzdak@… |Owner: nobody Type: Bug | Status: new Component:

Re: [Django] #18306: Deferred models should automatically issue update_fields when saving

#18306: Deferred models should automatically issue update_fields when saving -+- Reporter: akaariai |Owner: akaariai Type: | Status: reope

Re: [Django] #18638: Reverse OneToOne relationship does not save properly.

#18638: Reverse OneToOne relationship does not save properly. -+- Reporter: dhatch |Owner: nobody Type: Bug | Status: closed Component:

Re: [Django] #5579: Trac activation mail is sent from 'webmaster@localhost'

#5579: Trac activation mail is sent from 'webmaster@localhost' -+- Reporter: tback|Owner: anonymous Type: Bug | Status: closed Compone

Re: [Django] #18638: Reverse OneToOne relationship does not save properly.

#18638: Reverse OneToOne relationship does not save properly. -+- Reporter: dhatch |Owner: nobody Type: Bug | Status: new Component: Da

Re: [Django] #18638: Reverse OneToOne relationship does not save properly.

#18638: Reverse OneToOne relationship does not save properly. -+- Reporter: dhatch |Owner: dhatch Type: Bug | Status: new Component: Da

Re: [Django] #18638: Reverse OneToOne relationship does not save properly.

#18638: Reverse OneToOne relationship does not save properly. -+- Reporter: dhatch |Owner: dhatch Type: Bug | Status: new Component: Da

Re: [Django] #18638: Reverse OneToOne relationship does not save properly.

#18638: Reverse OneToOne relationship does not save properly. -+- Reporter: dhatch |Owner: nobody Type: Bug | Status: new Component: Da

Re: [Django] #5579: Trac activation mail is sent from 'webmaster@localhost'

#5579: Trac activation mail is sent from 'webmaster@localhost' -+- Reporter: tback|Owner: anonymous Type: Bug | Status: reopened Compo

[Django] #18638: Reverse OneToOne relationship does not save properly.

#18638: Reverse OneToOne relationship does not save properly. --+ Reporter: dhatch| Owner: nobody Type: Bug | Status: new Component: Database layer (mode

Re: [Django] #18637: FK.limit_choices_to doc says it's for admin, but works in ModelForm

#18637: FK.limit_choices_to doc says it's for admin, but works in ModelForm ---+ Reporter: Tuttle |Owner: nobody Type: Bug| Status: new Component: Documen

Re: [Django] #15084: Unnecessary imports lead to ImportError

#15084: Unnecessary imports lead to ImportError --+ Reporter: vanschelven |Owner: nobody Type: Bug | Status: reopened Component: Internati

Re: [Django] #11154: Inconsistency with permissions for proxy models

#11154: Inconsistency with permissions for proxy models -+- Reporter: etianen |Owner: nobody Type: Bug | Status: new Component: contrib.

Re: [Django] #3881: Don't mask server exception with session save exception

#3881: Don't mask server exception with session save exception --+ Reporter: hauserx@… |Owner: adrian Type: Bug | Status: closed Component: contrib.

[django/django] aeda55: Fixed #3881 -- skip saving session when response s...

Branch: refs/heads/master Home: https://github.com/django/django Commit: aeda55e6bffc3cfbf53698af398a19c1a0f02d46 https://github.com/django/django/commit/aeda55e6bffc3cfbf53698af398a19c1a0f02d46 Author: Anssi Kääriäinen Date: 2012-07-16 (Mon, 16 Jul 2012) Changed paths:

[Django] #18637: FK.limit_choices_to doc says it's for admin, but works in ModelForm

#18637: FK.limit_choices_to doc says it's for admin, but works in ModelForm ---+ Reporter: Tuttle | Owner: nobody Type: Bug| Status: new Component: Documentation |Version: master Severity:

Re: [Django] #18635: Getting Error while added admin theam in local app --Directory indexes are not allowed here.

#18635: Getting Error while added admin theam in local app --Directory indexes are not allowed here. ---+-- Reporter: chhotubayas@… |Owner: nobody Type: Bug| Status:

[django/django] bebbbb: Fixed #18056 - Cleared aggregations on DateQuery.a...

Branch: refs/heads/master Home: https://github.com/django/django Commit: be7af096ecffc0d7585617fdfacb196bc7c2 https://github.com/django/django/commit/be7af096ecffc0d7585617fdfacb196bc7c2 Author: Nuno Maltez Date: 2012-07-16 (Mon, 16 Jul 2012) Changed paths: M dj

Re: [Django] #18056: query_set.dates('field_name', 'years') does not return distinct elements

#18056: query_set.dates('field_name', 'years') does not return distinct elements -+- Reporter: framazz@…|Owner: nmfm Type: Bug | Status: close

Re: [Django] #56: MySQL id columns should be UNSIGNED

#56: MySQL id columns should be UNSIGNED -+- Reporter: Manuzhai |Owner: Type: New feature | Status: new Component: Database layer |

Re: [Django] #13844: Errors when using character fields for aggregation

#13844: Errors when using character fields for aggregation -+- Reporter: zegrep@… |Owner: wogan Type: Bug | Status: assigned Component: D

Re: [Django] #15053: Make templates more reusable by Improving template loading algorithm to avoid extending infinite recursion

#15053: Make templates more reusable by Improving template loading algorithm to avoid extending infinite recursion -+ Reporter: pmartin |Owner: nobody Type: New feature |

Re: [Django] #18636: django-admin.py startproject mysite

#18636: django-admin.py startproject mysite ---+-- Reporter: anonymous |Owner: nobody Type: Uncategorized | Status: closed Component: Documentation |

[Django] #18636: django-admin.py startproject mysite

#18636: django-admin.py startproject mysite ---+ Reporter: anonymous | Owner: nobody Type: Uncategorized | Status: new Component: Documentation |Version: 1.3 Severity: Normal | Keywords: Tri

Re: [Django] #5725: Inspectdb makes too long CharFields

#5725: Inspectdb makes too long CharFields -+- Reporter: anonymous|Owner: nobody Type: Bug | Status: new Component: Core (Management

Re: [Django] #18635: Getting Error while added admin theam in local app --Directory indexes are not allowed here.

#18635: Getting Error while added admin theam in local app --Directory indexes are not allowed here. ---+-- Reporter: chhotubayas@… |Owner: nobody Type: Bug| Status:

[Django] #18635: Getting Error while added admin theam in local app --Directory indexes are not allowed here.

#18635: Getting Error while added admin theam in local app --Directory indexes are not allowed here. ---+ Reporter: chhotubayas@… | Owner: nobody Type: Bug| Status: new Component: contrib.admin |Versi

Re: [Django] #18212: GenericIPAddressField does not handle verbose_name and name args like other field types

#18212: GenericIPAddressField does not handle verbose_name and name args like other field types -+- Reporter: toofishes|Owner: Type: Bug | Stat

Re: [Django] #18634: Escaping in the startproject command

#18634: Escaping in the startproject command -+- Reporter: mjtamlyn |Owner: nobody Type: Bug | Status: new Component: Core (Management

[Django] #18634: Escaping in the startproject command

#18634: Escaping in the startproject command + Reporter: mjtamlyn| Owner: nobody Type: Bug | Status: new Component: Core (Management commands) |Version:

Re: [Django] #15932: related_name='+' ignored in ManyToManyField validation

#15932: related_name='+' ignored in ManyToManyField validation ---+-- Reporter: Fredde |Owner: nobody Type: Bug| Status: new Component: Documentation |

Re: [Django] #13161: Ticked 2514 and 5171, solution for using Django with other psycopg2 applications.

#13161: Ticked 2514 and 5171, solution for using Django with other psycopg2 applications. -+- Reporter: spoksss |Owner: nobody Type: Bug | Sta

Re: [Django] #15932: related_name='+' ignored in ManyToManyField validation

#15932: related_name='+' ignored in ManyToManyField validation ---+-- Reporter: Fredde |Owner: nobody Type: Bug| Status: new Component: Documentation |

Re: [Django] #13161: Ticked 2514 and 5171, solution for using Django with other psycopg2 applications.

#13161: Ticked 2514 and 5171, solution for using Django with other psycopg2 applications. -+- Reporter: spoksss |Owner: nobody Type: Bug | Sta

Re: [Django] #18629: Adding methods/attributes to date-based views (was: Adding methods/attributes to editing views)

#18629: Adding methods/attributes to date-based views --+ Reporter: pydanny |Owner: donigian Type: Cleanup/optimization | Status: reopened Component: D

Re: [Django] #15932: related_name='+' ignored in ManyToManyField validation

#15932: related_name='+' ignored in ManyToManyField validation ---+-- Reporter: Fredde |Owner: nobody Type: Bug| Status: new Component: Documentation |

Re: [Django] #18632: Cleanup on methods/attributes associated with editing views

#18632: Cleanup on methods/attributes associated with editing views --+ Reporter: pydanny |Owner: pydanny Type: Cleanup/optimization | Status: reopened

Re: [Django] #16011: Improve Django documentation search engine results relevancy

#16011: Improve Django documentation search engine results relevancy -+- Reporter: info.ksamuel@… |Owner: nobody Type: | Status: new Cleanup/o

Re: [Django] #18633: Can't use parenthesis in Documentation search bar

#18633: Can't use parenthesis in Documentation search bar -+- Reporter: kevinlondon |Owner: nobody Type: Bug | Status: new Component: Django