Re: [Django] #26178: Weird Queryset Result

2016-02-04 Thread Django
#26178: Weird Queryset Result -+- Reporter: heseba |Owner: nobody Type: Uncategorized| Status: closed Component: Database layer |

Re: [Django] #26144: Warn if a proxy model is an argument to dumpdata

2016-02-04 Thread Django
#26144: Warn if a proxy model is an argument to dumpdata -+- Reporter: kissgyorgy |Owner: nobody Type: | Status: closed

Re: [Django] #26177: Using a Postgres database with TIME_ZONE set to None and USE_TZ set to False causes an exception

2016-02-04 Thread Django
#26177: Using a Postgres database with TIME_ZONE set to None and USE_TZ set to False causes an exception -+- Reporter: jensen-cochran |Owner: nobody Type: Bug |

Re: [Django] #18059: Admin inlines appear to be blind to releated_name relations

2016-02-04 Thread Django
#18059: Admin inlines appear to be blind to releated_name relations -+- Reporter: shayne.oneill@… |Owner: nobody Type: Bug | Status: closed

Re: [Django] #26178: Weird Queryset Result

2016-02-04 Thread Django
#26178: Weird Queryset Result -+- Reporter: heseba |Owner: nobody Type: Uncategorized| Status: closed Component: Database layer |

[Django] #26178: Weird Queryset Result

2016-02-04 Thread Django
#26178: Weird Queryset Result --+ Reporter: heseba| Owner: nobody Type: Uncategorized | Status: new Component: Database layer (models, ORM) |Version: 1.9

Re: [Django] #18059: Admin inlines appear to be blind to releated_name relations

2016-02-04 Thread Django
#18059: Admin inlines appear to be blind to releated_name relations -+- Reporter: shayne.oneill@… |Owner: nobody Type: Bug | Status: closed

Re: [Django] #25307: Cannot use .annotate with conditional expressions

2016-02-04 Thread Django
#25307: Cannot use .annotate with conditional expressions -+- Reporter: jproffitt|Owner: nobody Type: Bug | Status: new Component:

[Django] #26177: Using a Postgres database with TIME_ZONE set to None and USE_TZ set to False causes an exception

2016-02-04 Thread Django
#26177: Using a Postgres database with TIME_ZONE set to None and USE_TZ set to False causes an exception -+- Reporter: jensen-cochran | Owner: nobody Type: Bug | Status: new

Re: [Django] #26149: Invalid migration generated when using order_with_respect_to and a unique_together constraint

2016-02-04 Thread Django
#26149: Invalid migration generated when using order_with_respect_to and a unique_together constraint +-- Reporter: richardxia |Owner: anabelensc Type: Bug | Status:

Re: [Django] #26176: Fix E123 flake8 warnings (closing bracket does not match indentation of opening bracket's line)

2016-02-04 Thread Django
#26176: Fix E123 flake8 warnings (closing bracket does not match indentation of opening bracket's line) --+ Reporter: timgraham |Owner: nobody Type: Cleanup/optimization |

[Django] #26176: Fix E123 flake8 warnings (closing bracket does not match indentation of opening bracket's line)

2016-02-04 Thread Django
#26176: Fix E123 flake8 warnings (closing bracket does not match indentation of opening bracket's line) + Reporter: timgraham | Owner: nobody Type: Cleanup/optimization

Re: [Django] #25307: Cannot use .annotate with conditional expressions

2016-02-04 Thread Django
#25307: Cannot use .annotate with conditional expressions -+- Reporter: jproffitt|Owner: nobody Type: Bug | Status: new Component:

Re: [Django] #26175: Use create_user() managers in tests instead of hardcoding sha1 hashes

2016-02-04 Thread Django
#26175: Use create_user() managers in tests instead of hardcoding sha1 hashes --+ Reporter: timgraham |Owner: nobody Type: Cleanup/optimization | Status: new

[Django] #26175: Use create_user() managers in tests instead of hardcoding sha1 hashes

2016-02-04 Thread Django
#26175: Use create_user() managers in tests instead of hardcoding sha1 hashes + Reporter: timgraham | Owner: nobody Type: Cleanup/optimization | Status: new

Re: [Django] #26089: Remove auth's custom user test models (their tables aren't created since Django 1.8)

2016-02-04 Thread Django
#26089: Remove auth's custom user test models (their tables aren't created since Django 1.8) -+- Reporter: charettes|Owner: charettes Type: Bug |

Re: [Django] #26089: Remove auth's custom user test models (their tables aren't created since Django 1.8) (was: The auth custom test model tables are not created anymore.)

2016-02-04 Thread Django
#26089: Remove auth's custom user test models (their tables aren't created since Django 1.8) -+- Reporter: charettes|Owner: charettes Type: Bug |

Re: [Django] #26089: The auth custom test model tables are not created anymore.

2016-02-04 Thread Django
#26089: The auth custom test model tables are not created anymore. -+- Reporter: charettes|Owner: charettes Type: Bug | Status: assigned

Re: [Django] #26089: The auth custom test model tables are not created anymore.

2016-02-04 Thread Django
#26089: The auth custom test model tables are not created anymore. --+- Reporter: charettes |Owner: charettes Type: Bug | Status: assigned Component:

Re: [Django] #13875: submit_row templatetag should pass whole context

2016-02-04 Thread Django
#13875: submit_row templatetag should pass whole context -+- Reporter: drul |Owner: dArignac Type: New feature | Status: closed Component:

Re: [Django] #26174: Validation fails for DateTimeField(widget= widgets.AdminSplitDateTime) in Django 1.9

2016-02-04 Thread Django
#26174: Validation fails for DateTimeField(widget= widgets.AdminSplitDateTime) in Django 1.9 -+- Reporter: Josh-Git-Hub |Owner: rfleschenberg Type: Bug |

Re: [Django] #26014: Parse the CONTENT_TYPE header once, and record it on the request

2016-02-04 Thread Django
#26014: Parse the CONTENT_TYPE header once, and record it on the request -+- Reporter: funkybob |Owner: nobody Type: New feature | Status: new

Re: [Django] #26174: Validation fails for DateTimeField(widget= widgets.AdminSplitDateTime) in Django 1.9

2016-02-04 Thread Django
#26174: Validation fails for DateTimeField(widget= widgets.AdminSplitDateTime) in Django 1.9 -+- Reporter: Josh-Git-Hub |Owner: rfleschenberg Type: Bug |

Re: [Django] #26146: CsrfViewMiddleware responds to any arbitrary HTTP method outside of 'GET', 'HEAD', 'OPTIONS', and 'TRACE'

2016-02-04 Thread Django
#26146: CsrfViewMiddleware responds to any arbitrary HTTP method outside of 'GET', 'HEAD', 'OPTIONS', and 'TRACE' -+- Reporter: finetype |Owner: nobody Type:

Re: [Django] #26146: CsrfViewMiddleware responds to any arbitrary HTTP method outside of 'GET', 'HEAD', 'OPTIONS', and 'TRACE'

2016-02-04 Thread Django
#26146: CsrfViewMiddleware responds to any arbitrary HTTP method outside of 'GET', 'HEAD', 'OPTIONS', and 'TRACE' -+- Reporter: finetype |Owner: nobody Type:

Re: [Django] #26174: Validation fails for DateTimeField(widget= widgets.AdminSplitDateTime) in Django 1.9

2016-02-04 Thread Django
#26174: Validation fails for DateTimeField(widget= widgets.AdminSplitDateTime) in Django 1.9 -+- Reporter: Josh-Git-Hub |Owner: rfleschenberg Type: Bug |

Re: [Django] #26146: CsrfViewMiddleware responds to any arbitrary HTTP method outside of 'GET', 'HEAD', 'OPTIONS', and 'TRACE'

2016-02-04 Thread Django
#26146: CsrfViewMiddleware responds to any arbitrary HTTP method outside of 'GET', 'HEAD', 'OPTIONS', and 'TRACE' -+- Reporter: finetype |Owner: nobody Type:

Re: [Django] #26146: CsrfViewMiddleware responds to any arbitrary HTTP method outside of 'GET', 'HEAD', 'OPTIONS', and 'TRACE'

2016-02-04 Thread Django
#26146: CsrfViewMiddleware responds to any arbitrary HTTP method outside of 'GET', 'HEAD', 'OPTIONS', and 'TRACE' -+- Reporter: finetype |Owner: nobody Type:

Re: [Django] #26033: Add argon2 password hasher

2016-02-04 Thread Django
#26033: Add argon2 password hasher --+ Reporter: timgraham |Owner: nobody Type: New feature | Status: new Component: contrib.auth | Version: master

Re: [Django] #26146: CsrfViewMiddleware responds to any arbitrary HTTP method outside of 'GET', 'HEAD', 'OPTIONS', and 'TRACE'

2016-02-04 Thread Django
#26146: CsrfViewMiddleware responds to any arbitrary HTTP method outside of 'GET', 'HEAD', 'OPTIONS', and 'TRACE' -+- Reporter: finetype |Owner: nobody Type:

Re: [Django] #26165: Add an FAQ that explains why Django's CSRF isn't vulnerable

2016-02-04 Thread Django
#26165: Add an FAQ that explains why Django's CSRF isn't vulnerable -+- Reporter: timgraham|Owner: acemaster Type: | Status: assigned

Re: [Django] #14370: Adding support for Autocomplete in contrib.admin

2016-02-04 Thread Django
#14370: Adding support for Autocomplete in contrib.admin -+- Reporter: tyrion |Owner: nobody Type: New feature | Status: new Component:

Re: [Django] #26144: Warn if a proxy model is an argument to dumpdata

2016-02-04 Thread Django
#26144: Warn if a proxy model is an argument to dumpdata -+- Reporter: kissgyorgy |Owner: nobody Type: | Status: new Cleanup/optimization

Re: [Django] #13875: submit_row templatetag should pass whole context

2016-02-04 Thread Django
#13875: submit_row templatetag should pass whole context -+- Reporter: drul |Owner: dArignac Type: New feature | Status: assigned Component:

Re: [Django] #12405: django.contrib.auth.views.logout() should support LOGOUT_REDIRECT_URL

2016-02-04 Thread Django
#12405: django.contrib.auth.views.logout() should support LOGOUT_REDIRECT_URL -+- Reporter: cmwslw |Owner: hobarrera Type: New feature | Status:

Re: [Django] #25850: Migrations ignore inconsistent history silently

2016-02-04 Thread Django
#25850: Migrations ignore inconsistent history silently --+ Reporter: shaib |Owner: nobody Type: Cleanup/optimization | Status: new Component:

Re: [Django] #26169: Reusable Apps tutorial references incorrect step in which templates were created

2016-02-04 Thread Django
#26169: Reusable Apps tutorial references incorrect step in which templates were created -+- Reporter: manish001in |Owner: | manish001in Type:

Re: [Django] #26169: Reusable Apps tutorial references incorrect step in which templates were created

2016-02-04 Thread Django
#26169: Reusable Apps tutorial references incorrect step in which templates were created -+- Reporter: manish001in |Owner: | manish001in Type:

Re: [Django] #6148: Add generic support for database schemas

2016-02-04 Thread Django
#6148: Add generic support for database schemas -+- Reporter: ikelly |Owner: akaariai Type: New feature | Status: new Component: Database

Re: [Django] #26174: Validation fails for DateTimeField(widget= widgets.AdminSplitDateTime) in Django 1.9

2016-02-04 Thread Django
#26174: Validation fails for DateTimeField(widget= widgets.AdminSplitDateTime) in Django 1.9 -+- Reporter: Josh-Git-Hub |Owner: rfleschenberg Type: Bug |

Re: [Django] #26174: Validation fails for DateTimeField(widget= widgets.AdminSplitDateTime) in Django 1.9

2016-02-04 Thread Django
#26174: Validation fails for DateTimeField(widget= widgets.AdminSplitDateTime) in Django 1.9 -+- Reporter: Josh-Git-Hub |Owner: rfleschenberg Type: Bug |

Re: [Django] #26174: Validation fails for DateTimeField(widget= widgets.AdminSplitDateTime) in Django 1.9

2016-02-04 Thread Django
#26174: Validation fails for DateTimeField(widget= widgets.AdminSplitDateTime) in Django 1.9 -+ Reporter: Josh-Git-Hub | Owner: nobody Type: Bug | Status: new Component: Forms|

[Django] #26174: Validation fails for DateTimeField(widget= widgets.AdminSplitDateTime) in Django 1.9

2016-02-04 Thread Django
#26174: Validation fails for DateTimeField(widget= widgets.AdminSplitDateTime) in Django 1.9 --+- Reporter: Josh-Git-Hub | Owner: nobody Type: Bug | Status: new Component: Forms |

Re: [Django] #24342: Add EnumField model/form fields

2016-02-04 Thread Django
#24342: Add EnumField model/form fields -+- Reporter: ovangle |Owner: nobody Type: New feature | Status: new Component: Database layer |

Re: [Django] #26172: Don't query the database when filtering an already empty queryset

2016-02-04 Thread Django
#26172: Don't query the database when filtering an already empty queryset -+- Reporter: seddonym |Owner: nobody Type: | Status: closed