Re: [Django] #31839: Add additional database functions.

#31839: Add additional database functions. -+- Reporter: Nick Pope|Owner: Nick Pope Type: New feature | Status: assigned Component: Database laye

Re: [Django] #31837: Possible manager migration bug

#31837: Possible manager migration bug +-- Reporter: Gordon Wrigley |Owner: nobody Type: Uncategorized | Status: closed Component: Migrations | V

Re: [Django] #31838: django.contrib.gis.geos.error.GEOSException: Could not parse version info string "3.8.0-CAPI-1.13.1 "

#31838: django.contrib.gis.geos.error.GEOSException: Could not parse version info string "3.8.0-CAPI-1.13.1 " ---+-- Reporter: palewire |Owner: nobody Type: New feature|

Re: [Django] #31839: Add additional database functions.

#31839: Add additional database functions. -+- Reporter: Nick Pope|Owner: Nick Pope Type: New feature | Status: assigned Component: Database laye

[Django] #31839: Add additional database functions.

#31839: Add additional database functions. -+- Reporter: Nick Pope | Owner: Nick Pope Type: New| Status: assigned feature|

[Django] #31838: django.contrib.gis.geos.error.GEOSException: Could not parse version info string "3.8.0-CAPI-1.13.1 "

#31838: django.contrib.gis.geos.error.GEOSException: Could not parse version info string "3.8.0-CAPI-1.13.1 " -+ Reporter: palewire | Owner: nobody Type: New feature| Sta

Re: [Django] #31829: Chaining KeyTransform with 'contains' lookup uses builtin lookup instead of overridden lookup

#31829: Chaining KeyTransform with 'contains' lookup uses builtin lookup instead of overridden lookup -+- Reporter: sage |Owner: sage Type: Bug |

Re: [Django] #31837: Possible manager migration bug

#31837: Possible manager migration bug +-- Reporter: Gordon Wrigley |Owner: nobody Type: Uncategorized | Status: new Component: Uncategorized | Vers

Re: [Django] #24686: Support for Moving a model between two Django apps

#24686: Support for Moving a model between two Django apps ---+- Reporter: Alex Rothberg |Owner: Abhishek Bera Type: New feature| Status: assigned Component: Migrati

Re: [Django] #24686: Support for Moving a model between two Django apps

#24686: Support for Moving a model between two Django apps ---+- Reporter: Alex Rothberg |Owner: Abhishek Bera Type: New feature| Status: assigned Component: Migrati

Re: [Django] #31122: Clarify how the Lookup class follow the Query Expression API.

#31122: Clarify how the Lookup class follow the Query Expression API. --+ Reporter: Hongtao Ma|Owner: AP Jama Type: Cleanup/optimization | Status: assigned

Re: [Django] #26624: Error when running sqlmigrate after dropping index (of index_together) without actually migrating

#26624: Error when running sqlmigrate after dropping index (of index_together) without actually migrating -+- Reporter: Akshesh Doshi|Owner: Type: Bug |

Re: [Django] #31834: Cannot sqlmigrate on Django migrations that change unique_together

#31834: Cannot sqlmigrate on Django migrations that change unique_together +-- Reporter: Brіаn Lаі |Owner: nobody Type: Bug | Status: closed Component: Migrations

Re: [Django] #31783: Filtering on a field named `negate` raises a TypeError

#31783: Filtering on a field named `negate` raises a TypeError -+- Reporter: Aaron Kirkbride |Owner: Hasan | Ramezani Type: Bug |

Re: [Django] #31837: Possible manager migration bug

#31837: Possible manager migration bug +-- Reporter: Gordon Wrigley |Owner: nobody Type: Uncategorized | Status: new Component: Uncategorized | Vers

Re: [Django] #31783: Filtering on a field named `negate` raises a TypeError

#31783: Filtering on a field named `negate` raises a TypeError -+- Reporter: Aaron Kirkbride |Owner: Hasan | Ramezani Type: Bug |

[Django] #31837: Possible manager migration bug

#31837: Possible manager migration bug --+ Reporter: Gordon Wrigley | Owner: nobody Type: Uncategorized | Status: new Component: Uncategorized |Version:

Re: [Django] #31783: Filtering on a field named `negate` raises a TypeError

#31783: Filtering on a field named `negate` raises a TypeError -+- Reporter: Aaron Kirkbride |Owner: Hasan | Ramezani Type: Bug |

Re: [Django] #29324: Change Settings to raise ImproperlyConfigured on SECRET_KEY; not initialization

#29324: Change Settings to raise ImproperlyConfigured on SECRET_KEY; not initialization -+- Reporter: Jon Dufresne |Owner: Florian Type: | Apolloner Cleanup/o

Re: [Django] #31792: Use `EXISTS(SELECT 1 ...)` for subqueries

#31792: Use `EXISTS(SELECT 1 ...)` for subqueries -+- Reporter: w0rp |Owner: Harpreet Type: | Sharma Cleanup/optimization |

Re: [Django] #25139: ModelFormSet: allow swapping unique values

#25139: ModelFormSet: allow swapping unique values --+- Reporter: Jon Dufresne |Owner: Parth Patil Type: New feature | Status: assigned Component: Forms |

Re: [Django] #31829: Chaining KeyTransform with 'contains' lookup uses builtin lookup instead of overridden lookup

#31829: Chaining KeyTransform with 'contains' lookup uses builtin lookup instead of overridden lookup -+- Reporter: sage |Owner: sage Type: Bug |

Re: [Django] #31836: JSONField's __contains and __contained_by lookups don't work with nested values on SQLite.

#31836: JSONField's __contains and __contained_by lookups don't work with nested values on SQLite. -+- Reporter: felixxm |Owner: felixxm Type: Bug |

Re: [Django] #31836: JSONField's __contains and __contained_by lookups don't work with nested values on SQLite.

#31836: JSONField's __contains and __contained_by lookups don't work with nested values on SQLite. -+- Reporter: felixxm |Owner: felixxm Type: Bug |

Re: [Django] #31836: JSONField's __contains and __contained_by lookups don't work with nested values on SQLite.

#31836: JSONField's __contains and __contained_by lookups don't work with nested values on SQLite. -+- Reporter: felixxm |Owner: felixxm Type: Bug |

Re: [Django] #30165: Deprecate ugettext(), ugettext_lazy(), ugettext_noop(), ungettext(), and ungettext_lazy()

#30165: Deprecate ugettext(), ugettext_lazy(), ugettext_noop(), ungettext(), and ungettext_lazy() -+- Reporter: Jon Dufresne |Owner: nobody Type: |

Re: [Django] #31836: JSONField's __contains and __contained_by lookups don't work with nested values on SQLite.

#31836: JSONField's __contains and __contained_by lookups don't work with nested values on SQLite. -+- Reporter: felixxm |Owner: felixxm Type: Bug |

Re: [Django] #31836: JSONField's __contains and __contained_by lookups don't work with nested values on SQLite.

#31836: JSONField's __contains and __contained_by lookups don't work with nested values on SQLite. -+- Reporter: felixxm |Owner: felixxm Type: Bug |

Re: [Django] #31821: FILE_UPLOAD_PERMISSIONS docs contain outdated note.

#31821: FILE_UPLOAD_PERMISSIONS docs contain outdated note. -+- Reporter: Pavel Mises |Owner: Harpreet Type: | Sharma Cleanup/optimization |

Re: [Django] #31835: JSONField's __contains lookup doesn't work in nested values on Oracle.

#31835: JSONField's __contains lookup doesn't work in nested values on Oracle. -+- Reporter: felixxm |Owner: felixxm Type: Bug | Status: clos

Re: [Django] #31835: JSONField's __contains lookup doesn't work in nested values on Oracle.

#31835: JSONField's __contains lookup doesn't work in nested values on Oracle. -+- Reporter: felixxm |Owner: felixxm Type: Bug | Status: clos

Re: [Django] #31836: JSONField's __contains and __contained_by lookups don't work with nested values on SQLite.

#31836: JSONField's __contains and __contained_by lookups don't work with nested values on SQLite. -+- Reporter: felixxm |Owner: nobody Type: Bug |

Re: [Django] #31836: JSONField's __contains and __contained_by lookups don't work with nested values on SQLite.

#31836: JSONField's __contains and __contained_by lookups don't work with nested values on SQLite. -+- Reporter: felixxm |Owner: nobody Type: Bug |

Re: [Django] #31827: Add test runner option to show N slowest tests

#31827: Add test runner option to show N slowest tests -+- Reporter: Ahmad A. Hussein |Owner: Ahmad A. | Hussein Type: New feature |

Re: [Django] #31836: JSONField's __contains and __contained_by lookups don't work with nested values on SQLite.

#31836: JSONField's __contains and __contained_by lookups don't work with nested values on SQLite. -+- Reporter: felixxm |Owner: nobody Type: Bug |

[Django] #31836: JSONField's __contains and __contained_by lookups don't work with nested values on SQLite.

#31836: JSONField's __contains and __contained_by lookups don't work with nested values on SQLite. -+- Reporter: felixxm| Owner: nobody Type: Bug| Status: new

Re: [Django] #31811: Add optional timing outputs to the test runner

#31811: Add optional timing outputs to the test runner -+- Reporter: Ahmad A. Hussein |Owner: Ahmad A. | Hussein Type: New feature |

Re: [Django] #31835: JSONField's __contains lookup doesn't work in nested values on Oracle.

#31835: JSONField's __contains lookup doesn't work in nested values on Oracle. -+- Reporter: felixxm |Owner: felixxm Type: Bug | Status: assi

Re: [Django] #27996: Add pgcrypto extension and GEN_RANDOM_UUID function to contrib.postgres

#27996: Add pgcrypto extension and GEN_RANDOM_UUID function to contrib.postgres -+- Reporter: Paolo Melchiorre |Owner: Paolo | Melchiorre Type: New

Re: [Django] #27395: Allow generating '

#27395: Allow generating ' 0 Comment: Pushed more recommended changes after review by David Smith; please consider merge again :) -- Ticket URL: Django The Web framework for perfectionists with deadlin

Re: [Django] #31835: JSONField's __contains lookup doesn't work in nested values on Oracle. (was: JSONField's __cointains lookup doesn't work in nested values on Oracle.)

#31835: JSONField's __contains lookup doesn't work in nested values on Oracle. -+- Reporter: felixxm |Owner: felixxm Type: Bug | Status: assi

[Django] #31835: JSONField's __cointains lookup doesn't work in nested values on Oracle.

#31835: JSONField's __cointains lookup doesn't work in nested values on Oracle. -+- Reporter: felixxm| Owner: felixxm Type: Bug| Status: assigned