Re: [Django] #31846: MySQL inspectdb doesn't handle composite keys

#31846: MySQL inspectdb doesn't handle composite keys -+- Reporter: François Poulain |Owner: nobody Type: New feature | Status: new Component: Core

Re: [Django] #31877: TemplateView.get_context_data()'s kwargs returns SimpleLazyObjects that causes a crash when filtering. (was: In Django 3.1, get_object_or_404 does not resolve SimpleLazyObjects, a

#31877: TemplateView.get_context_data()'s kwargs returns SimpleLazyObjects that causes a crash when filtering. -+ Reporter: Tim L. White |Owner: nobody Type: Bug |

Re: [Django] #31382: Silent failure when saving non-concrete field with update_fields

#31382: Silent failure when saving non-concrete field with update_fields -+- Reporter: Peter Law|Owner: Pat | Garcia Type: Bug

Re: [Django] #21181: collation specific query results ordering

#21181: collation specific query results ordering -+- Reporter: alan.kesselmann@…|Owner: Tom | Carrick Type: New feature |

Re: [Django] #31877: In Django 3.1, get_object_or_404 does not resolve SimpleLazyObjects, and throws "Error binding parameter 0 - probably unsupported type" from SQLite (was: In Django 3.1, get_object

#31877: In Django 3.1, get_object_or_404 does not resolve SimpleLazyObjects, and throws "Error binding parameter 0 - probably unsupported type" from SQLite -+- Reporter: cyface |Owner:

[Django] #31877: In Django 3.1, get_object_or_404 does not resolve SimpleLazyObjects, and throws Error binding parameter 0 - probably unsupported type from SQLite

#31877: In Django 3.1, get_object_or_404 does not resolve SimpleLazyObjects, and throws Error binding parameter 0 - probably unsupported type from SQLite -+- Reporter: cyface | Owner: nobody

Re: [Django] #31846: MySQL inspectdb doesn't handle composite keys (was: inspectdb doesn't handle tables with "id" field and without primary key)

#31846: MySQL inspectdb doesn't handle composite keys -+- Reporter: François Poulain |Owner: nobody Type: New feature | Status: new Component: Core

Re: [Django] #31846: inspectdb doesn't handle tables with "id" field and without primary key

#31846: inspectdb doesn't handle tables with "id" field and without primary key -+- Reporter: François Poulain |Owner: nobody Type: Uncategorized| Status: new

Re: [Django] #31846: inspectdb doesn't handle tables with "id" field and without primary key

#31846: inspectdb doesn't handle tables with "id" field and without primary key -+- Reporter: François Poulain |Owner: nobody Type: Uncategorized| Status: new

Re: [Django] #31846: inspectdb doesn't handle tables with "id" field and without primary key

#31846: inspectdb doesn't handle tables with "id" field and without primary key -+- Reporter: François Poulain |Owner: nobody Type: Uncategorized| Status:

Re: [Django] #11707: limit_choices_to on a ForeignKey can render duplicate options in formfield

#11707: limit_choices_to on a ForeignKey can render duplicate options in formfield -+- Reporter: Chris.Wesseling@…|Owner: Alvin | Shaita Type: Bug

Re: [Django] #31679: Django subtly produces incorrect query when the same keyword appears in both aggregate() and annotate()

#31679: Django subtly produces incorrect query when the same keyword appears in both aggregate() and annotate() -+- Reporter: StefanosChaliasos|Owner: (none) Type: Bug

Re: [Django] #29532: Make model/app urls configurable for admin

#29532: Make model/app urls configurable for admin -+- Reporter: Ramez Issac |Owner: nobody Type: New feature | Status: closed Component:

Re: [Django] #31866: Proxy model is ignored when referenced in select_for_update's 'of' parameter

#31866: Proxy model is ignored when referenced in select_for_update's 'of' parameter -+- Reporter: Daniel Hillier |Owner: Daniel | Hillier Type:

Re: [Django] #31866: Proxy model is ignored when referenced in select_for_update's 'of' parameter

#31866: Proxy model is ignored when referenced in select_for_update's 'of' parameter -+- Reporter: Daniel Hillier |Owner: Daniel | Hillier Type:

Re: [Django] #31866: Proxy model is ignored when referenced in select_for_update's 'of' parameter

#31866: Proxy model is ignored when referenced in select_for_update's 'of' parameter -+- Reporter: Daniel Hillier |Owner: Daniel | Hillier Type:

Re: [Django] #31866: Proxy model is ignored when referenced in select_for_update's 'of' parameter

#31866: Proxy model is ignored when referenced in select_for_update's 'of' parameter -+- Reporter: Daniel Hillier |Owner: Daniel | Hillier Type:

Re: [Django] #31865: Missing variable in admin template

#31865: Missing variable in admin template -+- Reporter: Christian Ullrich|Owner: Carlton | Gibson Type: Bug |

Re: [Django] #31865: Missing variable in admin template

#31865: Missing variable in admin template -+- Reporter: Christian Ullrich|Owner: Carlton | Gibson Type: Bug |

Re: [Django] #31869: Improving data migration using `dumpdata` and `loaddata`

#31869: Improving data migration using `dumpdata` and `loaddata` -+- Reporter: Matthijs Kooijman|Owner: nobody Type: New feature | Status: closed

Re: [Django] #31180: Deprecate default_app_config.

#31180: Deprecate default_app_config. -+- Reporter: Aymeric Augustin |Owner: Aymeric | Augustin Type: New feature |

Re: [Django] #31865: Missing variable in admin template

#31865: Missing variable in admin template -+- Reporter: Christian Ullrich|Owner: Carlton | Gibson Type: Bug |

Re: [Django] #31865: Missing variable in admin template

#31865: Missing variable in admin template -+- Reporter: Christian Ullrich|Owner: Carlton | Gibson Type: Bug |

Re: [Django] #31866: Proxy model is ignored when referenced in select_for_update's 'of' parameter

#31866: Proxy model is ignored when referenced in select_for_update's 'of' parameter -+- Reporter: Daniel Hillier |Owner: Daniel | Hillier Type:

Re: [Django] #31679: Django subtly produces incorrect query when the same keyword appears in both aggregate() and annotate()

#31679: Django subtly produces incorrect query when the same keyword appears in both aggregate() and annotate() -+- Reporter: StefanosChaliasos|Owner: Jacob |

Re: [Django] #31865: Missing variable in admin template

#31865: Missing variable in admin template -+- Reporter: Christian Ullrich|Owner: Carlton | Gibson Type: Bug |

Re: [Django] #21181: collation specific query results ordering

#21181: collation specific query results ordering -+- Reporter: alan.kesselmann@…|Owner: Tom | Carrick Type: New feature |