Re: [Django] #32691: Performance regression in Exact lookup on BooleanField on MySQL.

#32691: Performance regression in Exact lookup on BooleanField on MySQL. -+- Reporter: Todor Velichkov |Owner: Roman Type: | Miroshnychenko Cleanup/optimization

Re: [Django] #33257: Case() and ExpressionWrapper() doesn't work with DecimalField on SQLite. (was: Comparisons against DecimalField annotations behave inconsistently on sqlite)

#33257: Case() and ExpressionWrapper() doesn't work with DecimalField on SQLite. -+- Reporter: Matthijs Kooijman|Owner: Matthijs | Kooijman Type: Bu

Re: [Django] #33259: Model._meta.related_objects returns different values in shell and from the request. (was: The `Model._meta.related_objects` is return different values between shell and from the r

#33259: Model._meta.related_objects returns different values in shell and from the request. -+- Reporter: Hop Duong|Owner: nobody Type: Bug |

Re: [Django] #33256: Some schema tests don't clean up their tables

#33256: Some schema tests don't clean up their tables -+- Reporter: Tim Graham |Owner: nobody Type: | Status: new Cleanup/optimization

Re: [Django] #33259: The `Model._meta.related_objects` is return different values between shell and from the request

#33259: The `Model._meta.related_objects` is return different values between shell and from the request -+- Reporter: Hop Duong|Owner: nobody Type: Bug |

[Django] #33259: The `Model._meta.related_objects` is return different values between shell and from the request

#33259: The `Model._meta.related_objects` is return different values between shell and from the request -+- Reporter: Hop Duong | Owner: nobody Type: Bug| Status:

Re: [Django] #33258: inconsistent use of () and [] for attributes in ModelAdmin class - Also class variables (was: inconsistent use of () and [] for attributes in Admin class - Also class variables)

#33258: inconsistent use of () and [] for attributes in ModelAdmin class - Also class variables +-- Reporter: newearthmartin |Owner: nobody Type: Bug | Status: ne

Re: [Django] #33258: inconsistent use of () and [] for attributes in Admin class - Also class variables

#33258: inconsistent use of () and [] for attributes in Admin class - Also class variables +-- Reporter: newearthmartin |Owner: nobody Type: Bug | Status: new

Re: [Django] #33258: inconsistent use of () and [] for attributes in Admin class - Also class variables

#33258: inconsistent use of () and [] for attributes in Admin class - Also class variables +-- Reporter: newearthmartin |Owner: nobody Type: Bug | Status: new

[Django] #33258: inconsistent use of () and [] for attributes in Admin class - Also class variables

#33258: inconsistent use of () and [] for attributes in Admin class - Also class variables --+ Reporter: newearthmartin | Owner: nobody Type: Bug | Status: new

Re: [Django] #33257: Comparisons against DecimalField annotations behave inconsistently on sqlite

#33257: Comparisons against DecimalField annotations behave inconsistently on sqlite -+- Reporter: Matthijs Kooijman|Owner: nobody Type: Bug | Status:

Re: [Django] #33256: Some schema tests don't clean up their tables

#33256: Some schema tests don't clean up their tables -+- Reporter: Tim Graham |Owner: nobody Type: | Status: new Cleanup/optimization

[Django] #33257: Comparisons against DecimalField annotations behave inconsistently on sqlite

#33257: Comparisons against DecimalField annotations behave inconsistently on sqlite -+- Reporter: Matthijs | Owner: nobody Kooijman | Type: Bug

[Django] #33256: Some schema tests don't clean up their tables

#33256: Some schema tests don't clean up their tables -+- Reporter: Tim| Owner: nobody Graham | Type: | Status: new Clean

Re: [Django] #33187: Foreign key to a specific field is not handled in inspectdb

#33187: Foreign key to a specific field is not handled in inspectdb -+- Reporter: Thierry Bastian |Owner: Jordan | Bae Type: Bug |

Re: [Django] #33234: Migrations autodetector breaking with proxy models inheriting from mixin

#33234: Migrations autodetector breaking with proxy models inheriting from mixin -+- Reporter: Kevin Marsh |Owner: Mariusz | Felisiak Type: Bug

Re: [Django] #33224: BaseDatabaseFeatures.supports_mixed_date_datetime_comparisons comment references defunct date_interval_sql

#33224: BaseDatabaseFeatures.supports_mixed_date_datetime_comparisons comment references defunct date_interval_sql -+- Reporter: Tim Graham |Owner: Hasan Type:

Re: [Django] #33255: Closing tag inside textarea is being lowercased. (was: Closing tag inside textarea is being lowercased)

#33255: Closing tag inside textarea is being lowercased. -+-- Reporter: Dmitry Silaev|Owner: nobody Type: Bug | Status: closed Component: Template syste

Re: [Django] #33187: Foreign key to a specific field is not handled in inspectdb

#33187: Foreign key to a specific field is not handled in inspectdb -+- Reporter: Thierry Bastian |Owner: Jordan | Bae Type: Bug |

Re: [Django] #33255: Closing tag inside textarea is being lowercased

#33255: Closing tag inside textarea is being lowercased -+-- Reporter: Dmitry Silaev|Owner: nobody Type: Bug | Status: new Component: Template system |

Re: [Django] #33255: Closing tag inside textarea is being lowercased

#33255: Closing tag inside textarea is being lowercased -+-- Reporter: Dmitry Silaev|Owner: nobody Type: Bug | Status: new Component: Template system |

[Django] #33255: Closing tag inside textarea is being lowercased

#33255: Closing tag inside textarea is being lowercased ---+ Reporter: Dmitry Silaev| Owner: nobody Type: Bug | Status: new Component: Template sys

Re: [Django] #33254: Issue with django.forms.fields.FilePathField() and callable path

#33254: Issue with django.forms.fields.FilePathField() and callable path ---+-- Reporter: Chakib |Owner: nobody Type: Uncategorized | Status: closed Component: Forms

Re: [Django] #33254: Issue with django.forms.fields.FilePathField() and callable path

#33254: Issue with django.forms.fields.FilePathField() and callable path ---+-- Reporter: Chakib |Owner: nobody Type: Uncategorized | Status: closed Component: Forms

[Django] #33254: Issue with django.forms.fields.FilePathField() and callable path

#33254: Issue with django.forms.fields.FilePathField() and callable path -+--- Reporter: Chakib | Owner: nobody Type: Uncategorized | Status: new Compone

Re: [Django] #33187: Foreign key to a specific field is not handled in inspectdb

#33187: Foreign key to a specific field is not handled in inspectdb -+- Reporter: Thierry Bastian |Owner: Jordan | Bae Type: Bug |

Re: [Django] #33234: Migrations autodetector breaking with proxy models inheriting from mixin

#33234: Migrations autodetector breaking with proxy models inheriting from mixin -+- Reporter: Kevin Marsh |Owner: Mariusz | Felisiak Type: Bug

Re: [Django] #32996: Cache PathInfos on ForeignObject/ForeignObjectRel (et al)

#32996: Cache PathInfos on ForeignObject/ForeignObjectRel (et al) -+- Reporter: Keryn Knight |Owner: Keryn Type: | Knight Cleanup/optimization |

Re: [Django] #33230: Test client doesn't set explicitly provided Content-Type when data is empty

#33230: Test client doesn't set explicitly provided Content-Type when data is empty -+- Reporter: Markus Holtermann|Owner: nobody Type: | Status:

Re: [Django] #33243: Inline comment vanishes in parsed template, comment block is represented as CommentNode

#33243: Inline comment vanishes in parsed template, comment block is represented as CommentNode -+-- Reporter: D. W.|Owner: nobody Type: New feature | Status:

Re: [Django] #33247: PDF documentation build broken

#33247: PDF documentation build broken ---+ Reporter: AndrewN|Owner: AndrewN Type: Bug| Status: assigned Component: Documentation | Vers

Re: [Django] #33187: Foreign key to a specific field is not handled in inspectdb

#33187: Foreign key to a specific field is not handled in inspectdb -+- Reporter: Thierry Bastian |Owner: Jordan | Bae Type: Bug |