Re: [Django] #31825: RenameField with db_column should be a noop.

2020-08-13 Thread Django
#31825: RenameField with db_column should be a noop. -+- Reporter: Iuri de Silvio |Owner: Iuri de Type: | Silvio Cleanup/optimization |

Re: [Django] #31825: RenameField with db_column should be a noop.

2020-08-12 Thread Django
#31825: RenameField with db_column should be a noop. -+- Reporter: Iuri de Silvio |Owner: Iuri de Type: | Silvio Cleanup/optimization |

Re: [Django] #31825: RenameField with db_column should be a noop.

2020-08-12 Thread Django
#31825: RenameField with db_column should be a noop. -+- Reporter: Iuri de Silvio |Owner: Iuri de Type: | Silvio Cleanup/optimization |

Re: [Django] #31825: RenameField with db_column should be a noop.

2020-08-12 Thread Django
#31825: RenameField with db_column should be a noop. -+- Reporter: Iuri de Silvio |Owner: Iuri de Type: | Silvio Cleanup/optimization |

Re: [Django] #31825: RenameField with db_column should be a noop.

2020-08-03 Thread Django
#31825: RenameField with db_column should be a noop. -+- Reporter: Iuri de Silvio |Owner: Iuri de Type: | Silvio Cleanup/optimization |

Re: [Django] #31825: RenameField with db_column should be a noop.

2020-07-29 Thread Django
#31825: RenameField with db_column should be a noop. -+- Reporter: Iuri de Silvio |Owner: Iuri de Type: | Silvio Cleanup/optimization |

Re: [Django] #31825: RenameField with db_column should be a noop. (was: RenameField with db_column defined drop and recreate the same constrainsts on Postgres)

2020-07-26 Thread Django
#31825: RenameField with db_column should be a noop. -+- Reporter: Iuri de Silvio |Owner: Iuri de Type: | Silvio Cleanup/optimization |