In all cases below, the .env file will exist outside of the Django project
and will be referenced from the settings file. This allows you to customize
and secure each environment while automating the whole build.
*Developers*
Local settings will point tot he location of the .env file.
This
Migrations are different depending on your DBMS.
Why? Briefly, here are a few reasons :
1. RDBMS or DBMS (Database management system) is a software that
organizes the data in a database thus allowing for easy management,
administration, retrieval and manipulation of data by users or
Thanks for the reference Carsten.
I believe the approach I am taking, regarding optimistic locking, is
superior to what is proposed in that thread. Specifically:
- there is no need for a special version field to be added to the model
- because forms only update specific fields in the associated
an env file is basically imported into your OS environment, so you can
retrieve them with the same interface. That means you can easily include
that with your build environment, or inject in some other means. Can't do
that with settings.
Also, lets you keep one settings file, and use
Hi everyone,
I can't wrap my mind around why having my settings in a .env file is more
secure than having them in a local_settings.py file, or why one of the
various methods is better than another as long as you keep your local
settings out of your version control. Any opinions?
--
You
Thank you all for your replies.
Best regards,
~Ram
On Wed, Oct 20, 2021 at 9:07 AM Lalit Suthar
wrote:
> you can create apis with django-rest-framework and then can use them at
> all the backends for web and mobile.
>
> On Wed, 20 Oct 2021 at 12:58, Stijn Verholen wrote:
>
>> :D
>> On
Not exactly. Migrations try to be generalized across db types, but that
doesn't mean that you can be using db-specific features in your models and
ORM usage. Thats one reason its highly, highly recommended to use the same
database and version at all layers of your stack.
In other words, if
As far as I know, the migrations are "Python-Code" in themselves, only
defining which tables change in what way. Only when they are being
applied, this is turned into actual database code.
But you can test this easily by creating migrations and look at them. Or
use e.g. a postgres docker
hello,
I running an app locally using an SQlite database (I have not been able to set
up postgresql locally). I am running the same app in Heroku, using Postgresql.
If I run "makemigrations" locally, then push those migrations to Heroku (which
is using postgresql), will those migrations be
Hi Nick,
maybe this is a case for optimistic locking?
Does the thread at
https://groups.google.com/d/msg/django-users/R7wJBTlC8ZM/MIzvYkWyCwAJ help?
Best regards,
Carsten
Am 27.12.21 um 06:36 schrieb Nick Farrell:
> Hi all.
>
> I've been using Django for quite a number of years now, in
Hello
Thanks for the answer, but like I said, I'm working with DjangoAdmin and
not a custom form.
So DjangoAdmin already does this.
Also when I inspect the source code in DjangoAdmin it does have the
"multipart/form-date" in my form tag.
Regards
On Tuesday, 28 December 2021 at 09:35:42
Hello,
try
in your html template- I think this works...
Regards
Am Di., 28. Dez. 2021 um 08:26 Uhr schrieb Yorben Verhoest <
yorben.verho...@gmail.com>:
> So, turn out that the problem occurs because for some reason my
> request.POST data is empty.
>
> I found out because I wrote a custom
12 matches
Mail list logo
