Re: Use an aggregation function's filter with aggregate of a value from an annotation with a subquery

!! Daniel > Am 06.12.2018 um 16:31 schrieb Daniel Gilge : > > Hi everyone, > > @Matthew and @Simon Thanks for your answers! > >> I assume you are trying to work >> around the cross join of multiple table annotations? > > This is correct. > >> There&

Re: Use an aggregation function's filter with aggregate of a value from an annotation with a subquery

r=votes_filter), > ).filter( > votes_count__gte=4 > ).count() > > That should result in > > SELECT COUNT(*) FROM ( > SELECT 1 > FROM comment > LEFT OUTER JOIN vote ON (vote.comment_id = comment.id > <http://comment.id/>) > GROUP

Use an aggregation function's filter with aggregate of a value from an annotation with a subquery

Hi, I think I've found a bug. But I'm not sure and I never opened a ticket for Django before. So, I first wanted to ask here. I'm using Django 2.0 and this doesn't work: subquery = Subquery( Vote.objects .filter(comment=OuterRef('pk')) .values('value')[:1] ) Comment.objects.annotat

Re: Use SQLite file database for tests (and not in-memory)

E': 'test_database', }, }, } Thanks! Am Samstag, 10. März 2018 22:05:27 UTC+1 schrieb Daniel Gilge: > > Hi, > > *Introduction:* > > Django uses an in-memory database for testing > <https://docs.djangoproject.com/en/2.0/topics/

Use SQLite file database for tests (and not in-memory)

Hi, *Introduction:* Django uses an in-memory database for testing when it finds a SQLite database in the settings. However, the ChannelsLiveServerTestcase (of Channels 2.0) cannot be used with an in-memory dat

Handle changing users (e.g. a logout) in a scope/WebSockets

Packages: Channels 2.0, Django 2.0 Hi, When I understand it correctly a scope’s user object isn’t updated when a user changes (e.g. logs in or out in another window) for the whole lifetime of the scope. (Please correct me if I am wrong.) Now this can be a serious issue as you can imagine. Wha

Re: Channels 2.0 WebSocket demultiplexing

https://github.com/django/channels/issues/825> > > Andrew > > On Wed, Feb 7, 2018 at 1:53 AM, Daniel Gilge <mailto:d.gi...@gmail.com>> wrote: > Hi, > > how do you demultiplex in Channels 2.0 using WebSockets? > > I want to use a single WebSocket co

Re: Testing Channels database data missing in Consumer

m Mittwoch, 7. Februar 2018 04:31:14 UTC+1 schrieb Andrew Godwin: > > I'm not quite sure either. Does the test setup work if you are not in > async mode? > > Andrew > > On Tue, Feb 6, 2018 at 9:45 AM, Daniel Gilge > wrote: > >> Hi, >> >> this quest

Channels 2.0 WebSocket demultiplexing

Hi, how do you demultiplex in Channels 2.0 using WebSockets? I want to use a single WebSocket connection and be able to address different models according to the path. Daniel -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Django users" group. To unsubscribe fro

Testing Channels database data missing in Consumer

Hi, this question is related to Channels 2.0, Django 2.0, pytest 3.4, pytest-django 3.1 and pytest-asyncio 0.8. I created a pytest: @pytest.fixture def db_with_obj(db): factories.MyModelFactory() @pytest.mark.asyncio async def test_something(db_with_obj): print(models.MyModelFactory.ob