gle.com/d/msgid/django-users/CA%2Be%2BciXYQN3%2BwFgm7U3BU17rm5Rw9x-Y7uQ4Whd8Hn%2BgkfjLgA%40mail.gmail.com?utm_medium=email_source=footer>
> .
>
> For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.
>
--
[image: Inline image 1]
Michael Herrmann, MSc
Alser Straße 18/26
1090
http://groups.google.com/group/django-users.
> To view this discussion on the web visit
> https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/django-users/dd4e0868-7a69-4d46-87b3-a9b3e153f21d%40googlegroups.com
> .
> For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.
>
--
[image: Inline image 1]
o view this discussion on the web visit
> https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/django-users/c270d98c-7a14-4870-9f04-3ccfcb3abeb3%40googlegroups.com
> <https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/django-users/c270d98c-7a14-4870-9f04-3ccfcb3abeb3%40googlegroups.com?utm_medium=email_source=footer>
> .
>
&
lity to use
>>> related unsaved models in tests. So I just use my own subclasses of
>>> ForeignKey and OneToOneField with `allow_unsaved_instance_assignment =
>>> True` set on them (essentially reverting the safety change in 1.8). I
>>> haven't attempted to switch it on
On Tuesday, December 17, 2013 4:00:54 PM UTC+1, bobhaugen wrote:
>
> That's interesting, but how about making it free for open-source apps who
> give you a credit on their repos?
>
Interesting idea! We'll think about it.
Best,
Michael
--
You received this message because you are subscribed
On Monday, December 16, 2013 1:54:01 PM UTC+1, rush wrote:
>
>
> According to http://heliumhq.com/files/helium_license.txt it is not.
>
> Furthermore it is not free. According to their price page you have to pay
> at least 200 euro per year to use it.
>
We added a Social License yesterday that
took 66% fewer lines of code and 75% less
effort using Helium than with Selenium alone.
You can find more information and download Helium from http://heliumhq.com.
Any feedback would be highly appreciated.
Hoping to hear your thoughts and comments,
Michael Herrmann
heliumhq.com
--
You
7 matches
Mail list logo
