Your best bet is to take the responsibility of data entry away from
the admin interface, and just write your own. You can hook into
generic views (which contains a basic set of create/update/delete
views for data entry) and user permissions (if you want to specify
whether users can do certain
I'm attempting to integrate James Bennett's awesome comment_utils
package (http://www.b-list.org/weblog/2007/06/25/hacking-comments-
without-hacking-comments) into my Django project in order to gain some
control over comment moderation. Having played nanny to several
Wordpress blogs over the
That's a bit creepy. If not the DEBUG issue, then what? The parent
Apache process hasn't budged from 3MB since the restart and I can't
imagine what else would have changed between the 90MB period and the
30MB period. I loaded my project from svn so there were no .pyc files
initially, I've never
Epilogue: it looks like the major culprit behind my skyrocketing
memory usage was indeed my failure to properly restart all the apache
processes; it looks like the parent process was still storing debug
info from when I had DEBUG=True in my settings.py, so that setting it
to False and soft
class PizzaTopping(models.Model):
pizza = models.ForeignKey(Pizza,
help_text = 'Toppings to go on Pizza:
num in admin is how many will show up in Pizza',
edit_inline = models.TABULAR,
num_in_admin = 3,
> return HttpResponse(user.id) #just to test
>
> it returns error
> MOD_PYTHON ERROR
> TypeError: argument 1 must be string or read-only buffer, not long
> besides all that long error page
That's because HttpResponse expects a string (or read-only buffer) and
you've
> Depends on what RSS means for that platform when running ps. This may
> count private memory used plus shared memory use. If Webfaction is
> counting shared memory use in your 40MB limit would suck somewhat, as
> they would be double counting across all processes.
>
> If you run 'top' it
Kbytes here only, versus 200-500Kbytes for children.
>
> Anyway, work out whether how you are restarting Apache is killing of
> the parent process. If not work out how to restart Apache so it is.
> Also look at how much memory the parent is using and see if it is
> small.
>
&g
processes peaked at about
85MB. If there's a memory leak in my application, it wouldn't still
leak after I've restarted apache, would it?
I'll try the Webfaction forum too. Thanks, and keep the advice coming!
On May 29, 8:15 pm, "Jay Parlar" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On 5/29/07,
I've recently put up a newspaper site on Webfaction that was developed
without much concern for memory limits--coming from PHP, my knowledge
of memory issues is practically nil. Of course, Webfaction's plans all
have memory limits, and we're currently on Shared 1, which imposes a
40MB limit.
You may also want to look at this prelim generic relations UI for the
admin view:
http://net-x.org/weblog/2006/nov/29/django-generic-relations-made-easier/
On Apr 25, 8:58 pm, Drasty <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Thanks for the suggestion. Even if it doesn't work--I haven't really
> looked at
Never mind, I didn't realize that a) dictsort doesn't work so well
when passed related objects, and b) dictsort does great when passed
FIELDS of related objects, say, SportType.name. Problem = solved!
--~--~-~--~~~---~--~~
You received this message because you
I feel like maybe I've stretched the templating system to the breaking
point, but I'll ask anyways in case there's a solution.
I'm putting together templates for a calendar app, specifically one to
hold sports games/results. The first trick is I want to use the same
model for games already
I've read the Django docs on overriding the save() function on models,
and preventing an object from saving looks really easy. However, the
example in the docs fails silently--if you're working in the admin
interface and your object doesn't save because you've triggered a
"don't save this
I'm having problems with ordering based on related fields that may be
a clone of the issue brought up in ticket 1576 (http://
code.djangoproject.com/ticket/1576), though because that problem was
so old and the ticket was closed I wasn't sure where I should bring
this up. Also, it could just be my
15 matches
Mail list logo
