Re: NAS using Django

On Wednesday, March 9, 2016 at 7:15:17 PM UTC+7, Vayuj Rajan wrote: > > Hi, > I have a query whether we can implement NAS (network attached storage) > functionality using Django framework? > FWIW FreeNAS uses Django for its web admin (at least it did last time I

Re: sqlalchemy with django

On Saturday, October 10, 2015 at 6:11:55 PM UTC+7, suyog wrote: > > can we use sqlalchemy with django? > Yes, try one of these depending on your use case: https://github.com/Deepwalker/aldjemy https://github.com/johnpaulett/django-sabridge If they don't suit your needs & you're willing to be a

Re: Supprimer un COMMIT sur git

On Wednesday, August 12, 2015 at 5:01:03 PM UTC+7, Bassirou Ndiaye wrote: > > Bonjour j'ai commité une une nouvelle application sur GIT avec django et > je veux l'annuler Comment faire? > Vous n'êtes pas sur la bonne liste, ici c'est du Django en anglais, ce n'est pas de git en français,

Re: Best Practices for Migrations in Reusable Apps?

Wow, terrific and comprehensive answer (as usual) Carl, thanks! I'll adjust my approach accordingly, thanks very much! -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Django users" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an

Re: Best Practices for Migrations in Reusable Apps?

I was afraid of that, glad I asked. Thanks for your input! -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Django users" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to django-users+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. To post to

Re: What is the ideal web server to use with Django?

On Wednesday, May 13, 2015 at 5:06:47 AM UTC-4, termopro wrote: > > > No. >> >> Cheers >> >> Tom >> > > OK > > > :) > That's only evidence that a lot of people don't know how to

Re: Obtaining content from Git

Arg, Google Groups' mobile interface sucks for posting rather than reading. As I was trying to say: On Tuesday, November 25, 2014 2:43:55 AM UTC+7, reduxionist wrote: > > >Hence I was thinking: how much trouble would it be to have Django > >reach into Git rather than its data

Obtaining content from Git

>Hence I was thinking: how much trouble would it be to have Django >reach into Git rather than its database and obtain data there to be >filled into template slots? Ideally, there'd be the possibility of >running a filter (e.g. reStructuredText) between Git and the >template rendering. >What

Re: Actively developed/supported piston fork?

On Thursday, October 30, 2014 4:34:32 PM UTC+7, sams...@gmail.com wrote: > > I've inherited an app that was written for Django 1.4, and updated it to > Django 1.7. > ... > Are any being actively used/fixed/supported? Which one should I try? > While Russell Keith-Magee is definitely correct when