Re: Askani

2011-02-22 Thread Cal Leeming [Simplicity Media Ltd]
(re-sent) I have to disagree. Although it would be interesting to hear other peoples thoughts on this as well. On Tue, Feb 22, 2011 at 6:45 PM, Brice Leroy wrote: > Actually it doesn't. You'll still have to design your data model and > interactions. Coding basic model,

Re: Askani

2011-02-22 Thread Brice Leroy
Actually it doesn't. You'll still have to design your data model and interactions. Coding basic model, urls, forms etc... is definitely boring. This takes care of those repetitive tasks and let you the fun of customization 2011/2/22 Cal Leeming [Simplicity Media Ltd] <

Re: Askani

2011-02-22 Thread Cal Leeming [Simplicity Media Ltd]
I'm sure these will be useful to someone, but it kinda takes the fun out of designing a structure from scratch :( On Tue, Feb 22, 2011 at 5:47 PM, Brice Leroy wrote: > You should try http://www.djangogenerator.com > > - Generate model > - Views > - Forms > - Urls > > and

Re: Askani

2011-02-22 Thread Brice Leroy
You should try http://www.djangogenerator.com - Generate model - Views - Forms - Urls and manage User profile extesion Brice 2010/11/26 Wim Feijen > Nice! It definitely saves typing. Sounds like a right thing for > newbies, because when I was a newbie, I always had to

Re: Askani

2010-11-26 Thread Wim Feijen
Nice! It definitely saves typing. Sounds like a right thing for newbies, because when I was a newbie, I always had to look up which fieldname to use and oh the typos. Wim On Nov 20, 3:28 pm, Alvaro Mouriño wrote: > Hi. > > I'd like to introduce to you this idea I've been

Re: Askani

2010-11-21 Thread Joseph (Driftwood Cove Designs)
Hey Alvaro - I only meant that this tool might allow non-programmers (web designers, maybe even clients) to collaborate in the model proto- typing. Currently must use diagramming tools that don't generate Django code (mostly these tools want to generate the SQL directly) - would be great to have

Re: Askani

2010-11-21 Thread Alvaro Mouriño
2010/11/21 Joseph (Driftwood Cove Designs) : > Alvaro - > this is a nifty idea - will save time and improve consistency. > > Opens up model proto-typing to non-Django, non-Python, maybe even non- > programmer?  Could be used for collaboration during model design - >

Re: Askani

2010-11-20 Thread Joseph (Driftwood Cove Designs)
Alvaro - this is a nifty idea - will save time and improve consistency. Opens up model proto-typing to non-Django, non-Python, maybe even non- programmer? Could be used for collaboration during model design - especially if it presents an ER'ish diagram as you build the data model. look forward

Re: [RFC] Askani

2010-11-20 Thread Alvaro Mouriño
2010/11/21 Huy Ton That : > Behaves the same way with Opera 10 and chrome. > click new model > typed in 'testmodel' > in testmodel added 'testfield'. doubleclicked on charfield testfield > clicked on model fields docs link > opens 9 tabs in background, hm, in chrome it was

Re: [RFC] Askani

2010-11-20 Thread Huy Ton That
Behaves the same way with Opera 10 and chrome. click new model typed in 'testmodel' in testmodel added 'testfield'. doubleclicked on charfield testfield clicked on model fields docs link opens 9 tabs in background, hm, in chrome it was just 2... On Sat, Nov 20, 2010 at 9:11 PM, Alvaro Mouriño

Re: [RFC] Askani

2010-11-20 Thread RadicalEd
I didn't see it, thanks is an easy way. On Sat, Nov 20, 2010 at 9:11 PM, Alvaro Mouriño wrote: > 2010/11/20 Huy Ton That : > > From a visualizing data standpoint, I think it is very good. Model help > on > > the web opens three tabs though. For what it

Re: [RFC] Askani

2010-11-20 Thread Alvaro Mouriño
2010/11/20 Huy Ton That : > From a visualizing data standpoint, I think it is very good. Model help on > the web opens three tabs though. For what it is intended for, I think it is > superior to a CLI. Hi. I couldn't reproduce the bugs you mention. Which link are you clicking

Re: [RFC] Askani

2010-11-20 Thread Alvaro Mouriño
2010/11/20 RadicalEd : > Is awesome, I will start an app tomorrow and I'll use it to make me the life > easier, I'm thinking in combox with the different types of data (CharField, > DateField, etc) When you create a field you can edit it by double-clicking it. In the

Re: [RFC] Askani

2010-11-20 Thread Huy Ton That
face helps you see the relevant information clearly and hide the bits you don't need. It also helps you sketch ideas quickly. I'm very used to CLI (I use debian and coded askani in vim) but I believe that a GUI really makes a difference. Regards, -- Alvaro Mouriño http://askani.net/ -- You re

Re: [RFC] Askani

2010-11-20 Thread RadicalEd
Anyway, I think a graphical interface helps you see the relevant > information clearly and hide the bits you don't need. It also helps > you sketch ideas quickly. I'm very used to CLI (I use debian and coded > askani in vim) but I believe that a GUI really makes a difference. > > Reg

Re: [RFC] Askani

2010-11-20 Thread Alvaro Mouriño
? Anyway, I think a graphical interface helps you see the relevant information clearly and hide the bits you don't need. It also helps you sketch ideas quickly. I'm very used to CLI (I use debian and coded askani in vim) but I believe that a GUI really makes a difference. Regards, -- Alvaro

Re: [RFC] Askani

2010-11-20 Thread rafael.nu...@gmail.com
Didn't you consider a command-line tool to do that, like Rails scaffold? Would be nice. On Sat, Nov 20, 2010 at 12:28 PM, Alvaro Mouriño wrote: > Hi. > > I'd like to introduce to you this idea I've been working on for the > last month, a django models generator:

[RFC] Askani

2010-11-20 Thread Alvaro Mouriño
Hi. I'd like to introduce to you this idea I've been working on for the last month, a django models generator: http://askani.net/ Field options definition it's repetitive. Writing meta options leads to inconsistent use due to the variety available. "Inspired" by the repetitiveness of coding