django vs pylons - their servers showing a page which uses a template
with 5 variables (values returned by the view/controller)
no mod_python, apache or any other.
I'll test X + lighttp/apache soon (I need to read the docs ;) )
--~--~-~--~~~---~--~~
You
is this a test of django vs pylons or a test of mod_python vs wsgi ?
a pre-test showing a serving a simple static page through both of
them (also 15k) would highlight
if django's templating engine is indeed faster than pylons.
(and it might convince the pylons team to use mod-python instead of
The test django page used no DB and the test itself didn't do much I/O
operations and the system didn't go into swap. As for errors I get this
from the running server (in console):
###
Traceback (most recent call last):
File
I've done some httperf testing og the django server. I've used Arch
Linux (i686) on a Acer Aspire 5002 WLMi Laptop (AMD Turion 1,6GHz,
512MB DDR RAM) from text mode (no X running) I've tested a working
django server with:
httperf --server=localhost --port=8080 --uri=/test/ --num-conns=7000
nice, very nice :) pylons and Turbogears benchmark would add a bit of
flamish excitement to it... (and it would be quite interesting)
--~--~-~--~~~---~--~~
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
"Django users" group.
To post to
Andy Dustman wrote:
> On 7/14/06, Jacob Kaplan-Moss <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
>>On Jul 14, 2006, at 1:18 PM, Adrian Holovaty wrote:
>>
>>>Some folks benchmarked Symfony, Ruby on Rails and Django. Django was
>>>the fastest.
>>
>>By over 30% -- hell yeah!
>>
>>Now, I've always known in my gut
On 7/14/06, Andy Dustman <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
And with MySQL, to boot.
Nothing is perfect..xD
-- SDM UnderlinuxGarimpar.com--PEP-8"Mais vale um ponteiro na mao do que duas classes voando"
--~--~-~--~~~---~--~~
You received this message because you are
On 7/14/06, Jacob Kaplan-Moss <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> On Jul 14, 2006, at 1:18 PM, Adrian Holovaty wrote:
> > Some folks benchmarked Symfony, Ruby on Rails and Django. Django was
> > the fastest.
>
> By over 30% -- hell yeah!
>
> Now, I've always known in my gut that Django's pretty damn
On 7/14/06, Jacob Kaplan-Moss <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> On Jul 14, 2006, at 1:18 PM, Adrian Holovaty wrote:
> > Some folks benchmarked Symfony, Ruby on Rails and Django. Django was
> > the fastest.
>
> By over 30% -- hell yeah!
>
That's awesome... congrats Django developers!
-ian
On Jul 14, 2006, at 1:18 PM, Adrian Holovaty wrote:
> Some folks benchmarked Symfony, Ruby on Rails and Django. Django was
> the fastest.
By over 30% -- hell yeah!
Now, I've always known in my gut that Django's pretty damn fast, but
seeing it verified by the RoR website...
Priceless :)
Some folks benchmarked Symfony, Ruby on Rails and Django. Django was
the fastest.
Check it out here:
http://wiki.rubyonrails.com/rails/pages/Framework+Performance
And don't forget to Digg and del.icio.us!
http://digg.com/programming/Django_vs._Rails_vs._Symfony_Django_is_fastest
11 matches
Mail list logo
