Re: DjangoAMF status

2011-01-25 Thread njoyce
On Jan 22, 4:50 am, "Joni @ mindpulse" wrote: > Comparing all of them, It looks like PyAMF is the way to go, having > oficial sopport for django and all. > > Though I'm concerned about one particular issue... Suppose I have two > django models related by a FK. > > class Category(models.Model): >  

Re: DjangoAMF status

2011-01-21 Thread Joni @ mindpulse
Comparing all of them, It looks like PyAMF is the way to go, having oficial sopport for django and all. Though I'm concerned about one particular issue... Suppose I have two django models related by a FK. class Category(models.Model): name = models.CharField(max_length=100) class Product(mod

Re: DjangoAMF status

2011-01-21 Thread martinpajuste
In addition to the PyAMF, Flashticle , amfast , Plasma. -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Django users" group. To post to this group, send email to django-users@g

Re: DjangoAMF status

2011-01-20 Thread meaglith
Maybe PyAMF is another choice. --- Blog: http://douhua.im Twitter: http://twitter.com/genedna Website: http://douhua.im --- On Thu, Jan 20, 2011 at 10:58 PM, Joni @ mindpulse wrote: > Hello,

DjangoAMF status

2011-01-20 Thread Joni @ mindpulse
Hello, Does anybody know if this project is active, or if it works OK with django < 1.3 ? Last update was 2 years ago... Or maybe there are other alternatives? Any info helps. DjangoAMF manual: http://djangoamf.sourceforge.jp/index.php?UserManual_en -- Joni -- You received this message because