On Thu, Oct 30, 2014 at 2:54 PM, bobhaugen wrote:
> On Wednesday, October 29, 2014 12:26:01 PM UTC-5, Chris Hawkes wrote:
>>
>> All this being said, there is definitely a trend towards SPA's.
>>
>
> Does anybody else besides me hate the SPA trend? I much prefer apps that
> are separated into logi
On Wednesday, October 29, 2014 12:26:01 PM UTC-5, Chris Hawkes wrote:
>
> All this being said, there is definitely a trend towards SPA's.
>
>
Does anybody else besides me hate the SPA trend? I much prefer apps that
are separated into logical components where each component has its own URL,
rat
On Wed, Oct 29, 2014 at 1:11 PM, Glen Jungels wrote:
> the javascript frameworks (Node, Angular, etc) differ in that the execution
> is done client side
Node.js is a server framework.
--
Javier
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
"Django users" group
I have to agree that debugging javascript does stink. However, the
javascript frameworks (Node, Angular, etc) differ in that the execution is
done client side whereas for Django, any PHP framework and Microsoft
ASP/C#, the execution is backend on the web server. Depending on the
circumstance, the
As a business owner and full time Developer using C# and Visual Studio I do
all of my website building at home in Django. It's an amazing framework
that is far above anything else I've tried which includes, ASP, Node.js,
CodeIgniter, Yii and any other Python frameworks out there. (I'll admit
I just shipped my first commercial web application and found that writing
the backend with django was still a big win because the platform is so
stable and feature rich.
Authentication out of the box
REST api with django rest framework
ORM / migrations / etc with core django and south
mod WSGI +
I think I agree with James (below). I'm about to graft a javascript MVC
library or framework on top of a Django server, to make up for some
problems with Django templates and forms. Haven't done it yet, but need to
do something different. So I may come back here and repent...;)
I have worked on
+1 well said.
Cal
On Tue, Jan 28, 2014 at 4:59 PM, James Turley <
jamesturley1...@googlemail.com> wrote:
> I'm not sure I buy this stuff about JS taking over everything. The reason
> is that client and server are different domains, and we might reasonably
> expect - even in a pure JS-only shop
I'm not sure I buy this stuff about JS taking over everything. The reason
is that client and server are different domains, and we might reasonably
expect - even in a pure JS-only shop - people to specialise anyway. Apart
from the tiniest start-ups, there isn't really an evolutionary advantage to
ha
This is something I've been thinking about myself lately.
I'm working on a side project right now that is extremely JS heavy on the
client side. I eventually found myself saying screw it, and am now in the
process of rewriting the client side using backbone. Django is more or less
becoming a re
It makes for an interesting debate and food for thought.
Python has a lot of libraries and user contributions which can speed up
development, but like every language, has it's good sides and bad sides.
Django holds a strong position, libraries such as south, pipeline,
mongoengine, uWSGI and the D
On Tuesday, January 28, 2014 1:00:31 PM UTC+5:30, Avraham Serour wrote:
>
> you will eventually need to keep a couple of different codebases in some
> different languges.
> Say you get popular enough and now you need to launch a desktop app,
> android and iphone.
> Take dropbox for example, they
On Monday, January 27, 2014 5:44:12 PM UTC-5, damond...@gmail.com wrote:
Hi,
I would like to know if this community is somewhat worried about the
future relevance of Django (and other purely server-side MV* Python
web app frameworks such as web2py for that matter) given the curr
Coffeescript.org makes some of those things better, but it's no Python.
C.
> On 27 Jan 2014, at 23:57, "Tim Chase" wrote:
>
>> On 2014-01-27 14:44, damondevi...@gmail.com wrote:
>> Why then adopt Django (or web2py) for a new project today, instead
>> of going pure JS?
>>
>> I am a big Python
you will eventually need to keep a couple of different codebases in some
different languges.
Say you get popular enough and now you need to launch a desktop app,
android and iphone.
Take dropbox for example, they have a web version, desktop, android and
iphone (did I miss any platform?)
For desktop
The tech giants are pushing JavaScript more than Python these days.
JavaScript is said to be the future language for enterprise applications.
I think Python will be around but will play a third place role behind
JavaScript and PHP. Yes, I said PHP and I apologize but its true just look
at the
On 2014-01-27 14:44, damondevi...@gmail.com wrote:
> Why then adopt Django (or web2py) for a new project today, instead
> of going pure JS?
>
> I am a big Python fan in terms of design and principles,
If you like JS as a language, then it makes sense to do everything in
JS. However, I prefer Pyt
Hi,
I would like to know if this community is somewhat worried about the future
relevance of Django (and other purely server-side MV* Python web app
frameworks such as web2py for that matter) given the current momentum of
JavaScript (JS) everywhere?
There are many competing architecture patter
18 matches
Mail list logo
