Re: GenericForeignKey in admin

2006-06-23 Thread Jacob Kaplan-Moss
On Jun 22, 2006, at 2:00 PM, Jay Parlar wrote: > I noticed you just checked the patch in, thanks very much. I do have > the question though: Was the patch actually doing the overall right > thing? My patch modified the admin itself, instead of any of your > generic stuff. > > Maybe because of the

Re: GenericForeignKey in admin

2006-06-22 Thread Jay Parlar
On 6/22/06, Jacob Kaplan-Moss <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > Yeah, that's right -- there's currently no admin support. It'll get > there eventually; I just wanted the core code to get some eyeballs > before trying to write it into the admin. > > (Thanks for the pointer to the bug, Jay, I'd

Re: GenericForeignKey in admin

2006-06-22 Thread Jacob Kaplan-Moss
On Jun 22, 2006, at 10:24 AM, Jay Parlar wrote: > On 6/22/06, arthur debert <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: >> I've been playig with GenericForeignKey and they are great. > > I don't think any explicit work has been done yet to support the new > generic stuff in the Admin. There is in fact at least

Re: GenericForeignKey in admin

2006-06-22 Thread Jay Parlar
On 6/22/06, arthur debert <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > I've been playig with GenericForeignKey and they are great. > > One question though, they do not show up on the admin app. > > For example on the object that should be 'tagged', I would like to edit > tags inline. Is thart possible at all?

GenericForeignKey in admin

2006-06-22 Thread arthur debert
I've been playig with GenericForeignKey and they are great. One question though, they do not show up on the admin app. For example on the object that should be 'tagged', I would like to edit tags inline. Is thart possible at all? thanks, arthur