Forgot something:
I could print the form manually and not use form.as_table(). So I
can left out the fields I don't want. I think this is ok in this case.
Thanks!
Kai
--~--~-~--~~~---~--~~
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
Hi Lucky,
On 8/2/07, Lucky B <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> I think you should be using form_for_instance on the dvd instance
> instead of the generic form contructor.
> http://www.djangoproject.com/documentation/newforms/#form-for-instance
This works, and this is the way I had it first. But I d
I think you should be using form_for_instance on the dvd instance
instead of the generic form contructor.
http://www.djangoproject.com/documentation/newforms/#form-for-instance
On Aug 2, 11:14 am, "Kai Kuehne" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> No ideas anyone? :-/
--~--~-~--~~---
No ideas anyone? :-/
--~--~-~--~~~---~--~~
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
"Django users" group.
To post to this group, send email to django-users@googlegroups.com
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [EMAIL PROTE
Hi list,
sorry for bugging you again but I cannot solve this problem.
In my applications I have a model DVD and a model Genre
related via a ManyToMany field. The problem is that the
edit form doesn't show the selected genres already assigned
to a DVD instance.
The form looks like:
class DVDForm(f
5 matches
Mail list logo