ECTED]> wrote:
> Hello
>
> Is it possible to have multiple one-to-one relationships for a single
> class or is there a better way to do it.
>
> What I have is an event which has about 12 fields. Optionally any
> combination of a single weather record, a single event detail rec
Malcolm Tredinnick skrev:
> On Tue, 2007-08-21 at 21:21 -0700, Catriona wrote:
>
>> What I have is an event which has about 12 fields. Optionally any
>> combination of a single weather record, a single event detail record,
>> a single survey record and one of four event subclass records may be
Catriona
On Aug 22, 2:42 pm, Malcolm Tredinnick <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
wrote:
> On Tue, 2007-08-21 at 21:21 -0700, Catriona wrote:
> > Hello
>
> > Is it possible to have multiple one-to-one relationships for a single
> > class or is there a better way to do it.
>
>
On Tue, 2007-08-21 at 21:21 -0700, Catriona wrote:
> Hello
>
> Is it possible to have multiple one-to-one relationships for a single
> class or is there a better way to do it.
Not at the moment, no. OneToOneFields assume they are going to be the
primary key, so you're restricte
Hello
Is it possible to have multiple one-to-one relationships for a single
class or is there a better way to do it.
What I have is an event which has about 12 fields. Optionally any
combination of a single weather record, a single event detail record,
a single survey record and one of four
5 matches
Mail list logo