Re: OneToOne Relationships

2008-02-10 Thread Malcolm Tredinnick
On Wed, 2008-02-06 at 11:59 -0800, Vance Dubberly wrote: > Thanks that makes more sense than the current implementation. I hope > that using ForeignKey for the current relationships now will allow me > to update the with unique=True later ( of course realizing that I'll > have to play with how I

Re: OneToOne Relationships

2008-02-07 Thread [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Will we be able to use both ends of the relationship in filter() calls and such, or only the end that declares the relationship? --~--~-~--~~~---~--~~ You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Django users" group. To post to this gr

Re: OneToOne Relationships

2008-02-07 Thread NickJ
Is there a working version of this in trunk or a branch? On Feb 6, 12:10 am, Malcolm Tredinnick <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > On Tue, 2008-02-05 at 17:51 -0800, Vance Dubberly wrote: > > The Documentation has said for as long as I can remember (a year+) > > that the semantics of a the OneToOne rel

Re: OneToOne Relationships

2008-02-06 Thread Vance Dubberly
Thanks that makes more sense than the current implementation. I hope that using ForeignKey for the current relationships now will allow me to update the with unique=True later ( of course realizing that I'll have to play with how I access the ForeignKey). Vance On Feb 5, 2008 6:10 PM, Malcolm T

Re: OneToOne Relationships

2008-02-05 Thread Malcolm Tredinnick
On Tue, 2008-02-05 at 17:51 -0800, Vance Dubberly wrote: > The Documentation has said for as long as I can remember (a year+) > that the semantics of a the OneToOne relationship is going to change > soon. Any clue as to when this is going to change Soon. > and/or what it's > going to look lik

OneToOne Relationships

2008-02-05 Thread Vance Dubberly
The Documentation has said for as long as I can remember (a year+) that the semantics of a the OneToOne relationship is going to change soon. Any clue as to when this is going to change and/or what it's going to look like? -- To pretend, I actually do the thing: I have therefore only pretended

Re: Django newb question about status of OneToOne relationships in ORM

2007-12-26 Thread Malcolm Tredinnick
On Thu, 2007-12-27 at 00:11 -0500, Jake B wrote: > Hi, I read here: > http://www.djangoproject.com/documentation/model-api/ > > "The semantics of one-to-one relationships will be changing soon, so > we don't recommend you use them. If that doesn't scare you away, keep > reading." > > I've never

Django newb question about status of OneToOne relationships in ORM

2007-12-26 Thread Jake B
Hi, I read here: http://www.djangoproject.com/documentation/model-api/ "The semantics of one-to-one relationships will be changing soon, so we don't recommend you use them. If that doesn't scare you away, keep reading." I've never used Django before, and I'm trying to decide between using it and