Show us the code for your view. But are you sending through the files
in the POST each time?
--~--~-~--~~~---~--~~
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
"Django users" group.
To post to this group, send email to django-users@goog
On Feb 3, 12:10 pm, Erwin Elling wrote:
> It's probably not DrKayBee's view that's causing problems. Seems like
> it's the adminviews.
This was on the latest svn revision (9807).
I went back to 9781 (which was still on my system for a previous
project) and the problem seems not to exist here. Ha
> I went back to 9781 (which was still on my system for a previous
> project) and the problem seems not to exist here. Haven't had the time
> to dig into this any further, but maybe this helps someone else.
Sorry, made a mistake; On 9781 the problem is still there.
On 9084 (also quite randomly ch
Cool, you saved my life
On Feb 3, 10:50 pm, Ramiro Morales wrote:
> On Tue, Feb 3, 2009 at 9:40 AM, Erwin Elling wrote:
>
> >> I went back to 9781 (which was still on my system for a previous
> >> project) and the problem seems not to exist here. Haven't had the time
> >> to dig into this any f
On Feb 2, 11:29 pm, timc3 wrote:
> Show us the code for your view. But are you sending through the files
> in the POST each time?
It's probably not DrKayBee's view that's causing problems. Seems like
it's the admin views.
I have the same problem with a model with two filefields:
When I edit and
> Revision 9766 introduced some changes related to file fields, can
> you try to refine your tests and see if it is the one that broke
> things in your case and report back please?
I tried both 9765 and 9766.
Indeed, in 9765 I don't come accross the problems mentioned. In 9766 I
do.
Files that w
On Tue, Feb 3, 2009 at 9:40 AM, Erwin Elling wrote:
>
>> I went back to 9781 (which was still on my system for a previous
>> project) and the problem seems not to exist here. Haven't had the time
>> to dig into this any further, but maybe this helps someone else.
>
> Sorry, made a mistake; On 978
> I tried both 9765 and 9766.
> Indeed, in 9765 I don't come accross the problems mentioned. In 9766 I
> do.
>
> Files that were changed between these versions (by Jacob):
> db/models/fields/files.py
> core/files/base.py
>
> Erwin
I have the same problem too.
9765 works fine. 9766 doesn't.
I'm go
Had a look at diff from 9765 and 9766.
I think thata changes in release 9766 in db/models/fields/files.py
somewhow broke admin site.
9766 address ticket #10044 allowing direct assignment of File object.
It extends FileField model capability so I think we should focus to
solve the issue on admin si
9 matches
Mail list logo
