Re: SQL Queries with columns not in the DB

2006-07-13 Thread Malcolm Tredinnick
On Thu, 2006-07-13 at 10:48 -0400, Jason Murray wrote: > I'm reposting this because I was told my last post got lost in an existing > thread. Sorry about that. > > I figured out my syncdb question. It turns out that as long as the model is > defined correctly things go well. And the output from

SQL Queries with columns not in the DB

2006-07-13 Thread Jason Murray
I'm reposting this because I was told my last post got lost in an existing thread. Sorry about that. I figured out my syncdb question. It turns out that as long as the model is defined correctly things go well. And the output from syncdb will help you with any trivial troubles you might have