On Sun, Jan 8, 2012 at 2:44 PM, James wrote:
>
> To add to what the above poster said, the blog irrational exuberance
> has an entire series on django's loose coupling philosophy. href='http://lethain.com/replacing-django-s-orm-with-sqlalchemy/'>This
> article is on using SQLAlchemy. I've really
:
> On Jan 8, 8:43 am, Venkatraman S wrote:
>
> > On Sun, Jan 8, 2012 at 9:49 AM, Chen Xu wrote:
>
> > > Since Django has its own database schema, can we still use sqlalchemy
> > > instead?
>
> > Just to correct the nomeclature : Django has an ORM, and *
On Jan 8, 8:43 am, Venkatraman S wrote:
> On Sun, Jan 8, 2012 at 9:49 AM, Chen Xu wrote:
>
> > Since Django has its own database schema, can we still use sqlalchemy
> > instead?
>
> Just to correct the nomeclature : Django has an ORM, and *NOT* a database
> schema.
On Sun, Jan 8, 2012 at 9:49 AM, Chen Xu wrote:
>
> Since Django has its own database schema, can we still use sqlalchemy
> instead?
>
Just to correct the nomeclature : Django has an ORM, and *NOT* a database
schema. An application has its own schema.
And to answer the 'modif
Hi, everyone:
Since Django has its own database schema, can we still use sqlalchemy
instead?
Thanks very much
Best regards
--
⚡ Chen Xu ⚡
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
"Django users" group.
To post to this group, send email to dj
5 matches
Mail list logo