I think to have a progress bar is a *big* pro, but if Flash could be
avoided, I would be happy too.
my $0.02
dirk
On 18-jun-2007, at 10:42, patrick k. wrote:
>
> thanks for the feedback so far. I´m just waiting, if there´s more
> feedback.
>
> so far, it´s very clear that the integration of f
thanks for the feedback so far. I´m just waiting, if there´s more
feedback.
so far, it´s very clear that the integration of fancyupload is disliked.
thanks,
patrick
Am 16.06.2007 um 17:54 schrieb itsnotvalid:
>
> By the way I like the idea of Gmail upload methods too.
> But a flash plugin co
By the way I like the idea of Gmail upload methods too.
But a flash plugin could do something like "drag 'n drop" file
uploading which, javascript doesn't seem to cut right now.
It could be integrated as an option, not a requirement.
--~--~-~--~~~---~--~~
You rece
Hi Patrick,
Am Sat, 16 Jun 2007 12:47:46 +0200
schrieb patrickk <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
>
> I usually don´t like the idea of using a js-framework for the
> filebrowser.
> nevertheless, today I´ve seen this:
> http://digitarald.de/project/fancyupload/
I tried it too, and just after finishing the
I'm -0 on this because it's flash-based, but +1 for using MooTools.
tom
On Jun 16, 2007, at 12:47 PM, patrickk wrote:
>
> I usually don´t like the idea of using a js-framework for the
> filebrowser.
> nevertheless, today I´ve seen this:
> http://digitarald.de/project/fancyupload/
>
> it´s an s
I usually don´t like the idea of using a js-framework for the
filebrowser.
nevertheless, today I´ve seen this:
http://digitarald.de/project/fancyupload/
it´s an swf/ajax upload-tool for multiple files with progress bar.
now, I´d like to hear some opinions on integrating fancyupload with
the
6 matches
Mail list logo
