On Oct 13, 2005, at 7:15 AM, Sune Kirkeby wrote:
On 9/29/05, Jacob Kaplan-Moss <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
To pick one example: in a dynamic serving situation, KeepAlive is
your friend; [ snip a lot ]
Hmmm... HTTP Keep-Alive? Then either I'm misunderstanding
you, or everything you say is ex
On 9/29/05, Jacob Kaplan-Moss <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> To pick one example: in a dynamic serving situation, KeepAlive is
> your friend; [ snip a lot ]
Hmmm... HTTP Keep-Alive? Then either I'm misunderstanding
you, or everything you say is exactly opposite to what I remember
reading elsewhere
On Sep 29, 2005, at 8:03 AM, Simon Willison wrote:
That's more a limitation of mod_python than of Django itself. I
imagine that FastCGI and SCGI avoid this issue almost entirely -
the modules themselves are much smaller so it's less wasteful to
use them to serve static files as well as Djan
On 28 Sep 2005, at 21:25, Jacob Kaplan-Moss wrote:
Why? In case you hadn't noticed, Django has a pretty large memory
footprint; between Apache, mod_python, Python, the database
drivers, etc., Apache server processes tend to weigh about 10M each
(at least on my servers). Unfortunately, A
On 9/28/05, Jeremy Dunck <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> I hadn't noticed. Do you just load up your web servers with memory,
> or do you (allow Apache to) throttle concurrent requests?
In my experience with chicagocrime.org, I've found that the key lies
in manipulating the values of StartServers, M
On Sep 28, 2005, at 3:38 PM, Jeremy Dunck wrote:
On 9/28/05, Jacob Kaplan-Moss <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
...In case you hadn't noticed, Django has a pretty large memory
footprint; between Apache, mod_python, Python, the database drivers,
etc., Apache server processes tend to weigh about 10M e
On 9/28/05, Jacob Kaplan-Moss <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> ...In case you hadn't noticed, Django has a pretty large memory
> footprint; between Apache, mod_python, Python, the database drivers,
> etc., Apache server processes tend to weigh about 10M each (at least
> on my servers).
I hadn't notic
On Sep 28, 2005, at 2:48 PM, Jakub Labath wrote:
1. No it doesn't have to be external web server.
However, if you have the resources, it really should be another
server -- or at least another instance of Apache running on the same
server.
Why? In case you hadn't noticed, Django has a pr
Hi,
1. No it doesn't have to be external web server. Here is what I do with Apache.
SetHandler python-program
PythonHandler django.core.handlers.modpython
SetEnv DJANGO_SETTINGS_MODULE mysite.settings.main
SetHandler None
The SetHandler None w
Hey Everyone,
So.. I need to host all my non-django-generated files in an external
web server? Meaning that if my site requires a css file or an image
file, then it shouldn't be bugging django for it?
Does that mean I should leave my static html pages in an external page
as well? Or use the temp
10 matches
Mail list logo
