Re: URLField and Web Sockets URLs

2012-10-05 Thread Julian Cerruti
Oct 4, 2012 at 12:51 PM, Julian Cerruti > <jcer...@willowgarage.com > > wrote: > >> Apparently the current implementation of URLField rejects Web Sockets >> URLs such as ws://my.server.com/ >> >> This seems to be due to the implementation of the underlying

Re: URLField and Web Sockets URLs

2012-10-04 Thread Russell Keith-Magee
On Fri, Oct 5, 2012 at 12:51 AM, Julian Cerruti <jcerr...@willowgarage.com> wrote: > Apparently the current implementation of URLField rejects Web Sockets URLs > such as ws://my.server.com/ > > This seems to be due to the implementation of the underlying URLValidator, > which

Re: URLField and Web Sockets URLs

2012-10-04 Thread Kurtis Mullins
code base and modify/use accordingly. I'm not sure on the best way to make proposals. Hopefully someone else can chime in there for you. On Thu, Oct 4, 2012 at 12:51 PM, Julian Cerruti <jcerr...@willowgarage.com>wrote: > Apparently the current implementation of URLField rejects Web Soc

URLField and Web Sockets URLs

2012-10-04 Thread Julian Cerruti
Apparently the current implementation of URLField rejects Web Sockets URLs such as ws://my.server.com/ This seems to be due to the implementation of the underlying URLValidator, which has a regex to search for ftp or http based URLs only. Is there any chance the URLValidator regexp can