Yup, Selenium is a nice package ... if you have to go to trouble of
browser-based unit testing I would strongly recommend it too.
Thx for the feedback!
-Z
On 1/16/06, ZebZiggle <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> Matthew,
>
> Do you feel you can effectively test a web interface without dealing
> with Javascript in the client? I may be missing something, but I don't
> think twill supports javascript interpretation?
>
> -Zeb
>
>
Zeb,
At this stage my pub
Matthew,
Do you feel you can effectively test a web interface without dealing
with Javascript in the client? I may be missing something, but I don't
think twill supports javascript interpretation?
-Zeb
Thx Eric,
I'll look into this MixIn/No-table approach ... it seems interesting.
It looks like it should give me back the object-oriented features I
want of python and yet keep the business logic out of the view code. I
was wondering about using Manipulators as the controller, but I don't
know if
On 1/16/06, Eric Walstad <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> Hey Zeb,
>
> On Sunday 15 January 2006 13:54, ZebZiggle wrote:
> > Hi again,
> >
> > I'm messing around with my Model and my views and putting a 'unittest'
> > jig around what I'm building. Certainly, I don't want to test at the
> > view laye
Hey Zeb,
On Sunday 15 January 2006 13:54, ZebZiggle wrote:
> Hi again,
>
> I'm messing around with my Model and my views and putting a 'unittest'
> jig around what I'm building. Certainly, I don't want to test at the
> view layer (passing in HttpRequests and getting back HttpResponses),
I looked
Hi again,
I'm messing around with my Model and my views and putting a 'unittest'
jig around what I'm building. Certainly, I don't want to test at the
view layer (passing in HttpRequests and getting back HttpResponses), so
I find that I'm writing a "controller-like" layer between the view and
the
7 matches
Mail list logo
