Thanks for that information, Ian - I was anticipating a day or so of
reasearch next week to package up my app, but hopefully I won't have
to now.
--Jon
On 10/2/06, ian <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> Baurzhan Ismagulov wrote:
> > Hello mamcxyz,
> >
> > On Fri, Sep 29, 2006 at 07:43:49AM -0700,
Baurzhan Ismagulov wrote:
> Hello mamcxyz,
>
> On Fri, Sep 29, 2006 at 07:43:49AM -0700, mamcxyz wrote:
>> - Deployment. I work on Delphi and the idea of put a EXE and all is
>> working right (tm) is a feeling I lost with python on hosting.
>
> So what about writing a small script that will do
Just on the Apache 1.3 issue, I had the same problem on one of the
sites I developed, I was able to get the fastcgi module installed and
the site runs fine (has had some decent traffic levels).
--~--~-~--~~~---~--~~
You received this message because you are
Well.. let me add to this discussion as well :)
1) Loading 'static' templates is, imho, easily achieved. I wanted
to lad them from the file system, but ended up putting static views in
the database (using a custom, 15 lines of code template loader and a
filter). The most astounding feature is
I think that can be nice
Specially when is necesary setup other dependencies I know some
things can not be automated easily because the diversity of linux
distros, but something in the lines to show what is need to deploy is a
*good* start.
Hello mamcxyz,
On Fri, Sep 29, 2006 at 07:43:49AM -0700, mamcxyz wrote:
> - Deployment. I work on Delphi and the idea of put a EXE and all is
> working right (tm) is a feeling I lost with python on hosting.
So what about writing a small script that will do this for you?
Something like
tar cC
That was actually a conscious decision to keep from needing support
images for the debug pages. I wanted them to be completely
self-contained, which is why we used the unicode glyph for the
disclosure triangle (a pretty universal UI indicator) to indicate that
those sections could be expanded.
DavidA wrote:
> I agree that the UI could be tweaked to make it more obvious, like
> changing "Local vars" to "Click here to show local vars".
This will just make this pile of text look more scary :-). You and
Daniel didn't read it in the first place so changing text won't help.
But what will
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
>
> Here's my anecdote on that.
>
> Even though it was literally staring me in the face, it took me AGES to
> discover that the error dump page is actually interactive and has
> little sections that expand and collapse.
> I kept running into error messages which told me
On Sep 29, 2006, at 7:43 AM, mamcxyz wrote:
> - I dislike the indirection to run django class... the thing about run
> python manage.py shell to really touch the classes... is not very
> "pythonic", or mainly, convenient.
How can the python shell not be pythonic?
Don
I have some feelings with Django too, however after working two years
with ASP.NET (I'm certified by MS, if that show my commitment) and try
first with Clastle (a try on rails for .NET, but with the non-sense of
java-like framework) I found django.
I hate:
- Deployment. I work on Delphi and the
Sean Schertell wrote:
> Instead of
> providing some simple facility to let you override parts of the
> standard manipulators
In fact you can do just that. Though it's not clearly documented. I
recently wrote about it here:
> I kept running into error messages which told me about
> exceptions in the Django source code (this is the top part of
> the error page) and I kept thinking "well, where's the bloody
> use in that??? I want to know what MY error was! Grmbl.".
Django your easily find out if a module name in
James Bennett wrote:
> Tracebacks are a really hard thing to handle well in an application
> stack with more than a couple of components; generally the debug pages
> are nice, though, because they give you the local vars at each level
> -- when (as is often the case) an error occurred because
Hm... you could check Pylons, which would "solve" some of your problems.
--~--~-~--~~~---~--~~
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
"Django users" group.
To post to this group, send email to django-users@googlegroups.com
To
You can also just use the "next" parameter in the login form. Here's how I did it
On 29/09/06, Don Arbow <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
On Sep 28, 2006, at 6:26 PM, Sean Schertell wrote:>> (2) This is a biggie
On 9/28/06, Sean Schertell <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> (1) The clean modular apps aren't totally decoupled because they
> still have to use the project's template directory and css (which
> makes sense perhaps but complicates things for what I'm trying to
> achieve).
No, they don't.
On Sep 28, 2006, at 6:26 PM, Sean Schertell wrote:
>
> (2) This is a biggie for me. I can't believe that the authentication
> module forces you to use hard coded urls for login/logout pages --
> that's just maddening! So if you want to do it your own way, you have
> to totally roll your own
On 29-Sep-06, at 6:56 AM, Sean Schertell wrote:
> But I'm very sorry to say that one by one, all of these things turned
> out to be not so great after all. Here's what I found after six weeks
> of struggling to build a site in Django that would have taken a week
> or so in PHP
all the 7 points
On Fri, 2006-09-29 at 10:26 +0900, Sean Schertell wrote:
> Hi Guys,
>
> I just wanted to share with the community my personal experience with
> Django in the hopes that maybe some of my petty gripes might be
> somehow helpful. Before doing that, I have to thank everyone in the
> community
On 9/28/06, Sean Schertell <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> So at the end of the day, my experience with Django started off with
> a *lot* of excitement. I was thrilled because it seemed I'd found
> something that met my needs exactly. But in actual usage, I found
> that using django to build a
Hi Guys,
I just wanted to share with the community my personal experience with
Django in the hopes that maybe some of my petty gripes might be
somehow helpful. Before doing that, I have to thank everyone in the
community for being so helpful and just so damn nice! Thanks so much
to all